Debt transfer agreement by the creditor: legal forms, procedure, meaning

I. Povarov
{"title":"Debt transfer agreement by the creditor: legal forms, procedure, meaning","authors":"I. Povarov","doi":"10.18287/1810-4088-2020-15-2-58-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work catalogs and studies in detail (including in a comparative legal section) various legal forms of the creditor's approval of the transfer of debt by virtue of the transaction and on the grounds provided for by law. The main attention, first of all, is paid to debatable issues regarding the ratio of centralized and individual regulation of the relevant relations, the variety of ways to agree on the transfer of debt (models consent is a unilateral transaction, consent as a condition of the contract, etc.), the nature of the impact of (not) giving permission by the creditor on the fate of an agreement on the transfer of debt obligations concluded without his participation, comparison of the modes of preliminary and subsequent approval. The methodological basis of the research was formed by general theoretical (formal and dialectical logic) and special scientific (legal-dogmatic, interpretation of legal norms, legal modeling, comparative legal) methods. As a result, the author substantiates the feasibility of adjusting the legal provisions in the direction of a clear pairing of general instructions on consent to a transaction and special rules on consent to the transfer of debt, as well as in order to eliminate uncertainty about the actual moments of obtaining an approving creditor's will (subject of agreement, the essence of the nullity of the transfer of debt, admissibility the use of constructions of impersonal previously given and subsequent consent, etc.).","PeriodicalId":329485,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Analytical Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Analytical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/1810-4088-2020-15-2-58-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The work catalogs and studies in detail (including in a comparative legal section) various legal forms of the creditor's approval of the transfer of debt by virtue of the transaction and on the grounds provided for by law. The main attention, first of all, is paid to debatable issues regarding the ratio of centralized and individual regulation of the relevant relations, the variety of ways to agree on the transfer of debt (models consent is a unilateral transaction, consent as a condition of the contract, etc.), the nature of the impact of (not) giving permission by the creditor on the fate of an agreement on the transfer of debt obligations concluded without his participation, comparison of the modes of preliminary and subsequent approval. The methodological basis of the research was formed by general theoretical (formal and dialectical logic) and special scientific (legal-dogmatic, interpretation of legal norms, legal modeling, comparative legal) methods. As a result, the author substantiates the feasibility of adjusting the legal provisions in the direction of a clear pairing of general instructions on consent to a transaction and special rules on consent to the transfer of debt, as well as in order to eliminate uncertainty about the actual moments of obtaining an approving creditor's will (subject of agreement, the essence of the nullity of the transfer of debt, admissibility the use of constructions of impersonal previously given and subsequent consent, etc.).
债权人债务转让协议:法律形式、程序、含义
这项工作详细地(包括在比较法部分)列出和研究债权人根据交易和法律规定的理由批准债务转让的各种法律形式。首先,主要关注的是有关相关关系的集中和个别调节的比例、债务转让协议的各种方式(同意是单方面交易的模式、同意作为合同的条件等)、债权人(不)给予许可对未经其参与而订立的债务转让协议的命运的影响的性质。前期和后续审批模式的比较。研究的方法论基础是由一般的理论(形式逻辑和辩证逻辑)和特殊的科学(法律教条主义、法律规范解释、法律建模、比较法)方法构成的。因此,作者证明了调整法律规定的可行性,即明确结合关于同意交易的一般指示和关于同意债务转让的特别规则,并消除获得批准债权人遗嘱的实际时刻的不确定性(以协议为主体,债务转让无效的本质)。可采性(使用非人格化的先前给予和随后同意等结构)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信