Molecular techniques are better choice as compared to conventional methods for pathotypic characterization of Newcastle disease virus in poultry birds

M. Hammad, Farid Masoud, M. Luqman, M. S. Mahmood
{"title":"Molecular techniques are better choice as compared to conventional methods for pathotypic characterization of Newcastle disease virus in poultry birds","authors":"M. Hammad, Farid Masoud, M. Luqman, M. S. Mahmood","doi":"10.22194/jgias/10.969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Newcastle disease (ND) has importance in the poultry industry across the world. Despite vaccination, outbreaks of ND have been reported from various parts of Pakistan. The purpose of current study was to characterize the Newcastle disease virus (NDV) through different methods i.e., molecular techniques and conventional methods and evaluate their efficiency. To isolate pathogenic NDV, samples were taken from the commercial poultry farms after an outbreak, while for the non-pathogenic NDV isolation commercially available Lasota vaccine was used. In the first step NDV was tested by F gene sequence through RT-PCR. The predicted sequence of the amino acid in fusion protein indicates the following motif 112R-R-Q-R-R-F117 in pathogenic and 112G-R-Q-G-R-L117 in non-pathogenic NDV strains. While in the second phase, the pathotypic characterization of NDV was done through conventional methods like Intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) and Mean death time (MDT). The results from conventional methods were also in agreement with standard values. The findings of current study suggest that for the assessment of genetic nature and the rapid diagnosis of NDV; molecular techniques are better choice than conventional methods.","PeriodicalId":303968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22194/jgias/10.969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Newcastle disease (ND) has importance in the poultry industry across the world. Despite vaccination, outbreaks of ND have been reported from various parts of Pakistan. The purpose of current study was to characterize the Newcastle disease virus (NDV) through different methods i.e., molecular techniques and conventional methods and evaluate their efficiency. To isolate pathogenic NDV, samples were taken from the commercial poultry farms after an outbreak, while for the non-pathogenic NDV isolation commercially available Lasota vaccine was used. In the first step NDV was tested by F gene sequence through RT-PCR. The predicted sequence of the amino acid in fusion protein indicates the following motif 112R-R-Q-R-R-F117 in pathogenic and 112G-R-Q-G-R-L117 in non-pathogenic NDV strains. While in the second phase, the pathotypic characterization of NDV was done through conventional methods like Intracerebral pathogenicity index (ICPI) and Mean death time (MDT). The results from conventional methods were also in agreement with standard values. The findings of current study suggest that for the assessment of genetic nature and the rapid diagnosis of NDV; molecular techniques are better choice than conventional methods.
与传统方法相比,分子技术是禽类新城疫病毒病原学鉴定的较好选择
新城疫病(ND)在全世界的家禽养殖业中具有重要意义。尽管接种了疫苗,巴基斯坦各地仍报告了新风暴发。本研究的目的是通过不同的方法,即分子技术和常规方法来表征新城疫病毒(NDV),并评价它们的有效性。为分离致病性新城疫,在疫情暴发后从商业家禽养殖场采集样本,而分离非致病性新城疫则使用市售的Lasota疫苗。第一步采用RT-PCR法检测新冠病毒F基因序列。预测融合蛋白的氨基酸序列为致病性NDV为112R-R-Q-R-R-F117,非致病性NDV为112G-R-Q-G-R-L117。第二阶段采用常规的脑内致病性指数(ICPI)、平均死亡时间(MDT)等方法进行NDV的病理型鉴定。常规方法测定结果也与标准值一致。本研究结果提示,对新城疫的遗传性质进行评估和快速诊断;分子技术是比传统方法更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信