Clinical Effect of Virgin Coconut Oil Pulling in Comparison with Palm Oil Pulling on Gingival Health: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial

Nisachon Siripaiboonpong, O. Matangkasombut, Haris Pengcharoen, Bongkoj Boonchaiyapluk, Phakvalunch Rujiraprasert, Pijitra Petcharat, S. Chantarangsu, Supreda Suphanantachat Srithanyarat
{"title":"Clinical Effect of Virgin Coconut Oil Pulling in Comparison with Palm Oil Pulling on Gingival Health: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial","authors":"Nisachon Siripaiboonpong, O. Matangkasombut, Haris Pengcharoen, Bongkoj Boonchaiyapluk, Phakvalunch Rujiraprasert, Pijitra Petcharat, S. Chantarangsu, Supreda Suphanantachat Srithanyarat","doi":"10.12982/nlsc.2023.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The objective of this study was to compare the effects of oil pulling with virgin coconut oil (VCO), which contains antimicrobial ingredients, and with palm oil (PO) on several clinical parameters when used as adjunctive oral hygiene care in patients with gingival inflammation. In this crossover trial, thirty-six participants were randomized to group 1 to start with VCO and group 2 to start with PO pulling. The participants were instructed to continue their oral hygiene routine and to perform oil pulling by swishing 10 mL oil for 8 min for 28 days. After a 21-day wash-out period, the participants performed the protocol with the other oil type. The Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and salivary pH were recorded at baseline, the end of both intervention periods, and after the wash-out period. The before- and after-treatment values and the mean difference in the evaluated parameters in each group were compared. VCO pulling significantly reduced GI (P=0.004), while PO pulling significantly reduced GI (P=0.010) and PI (P=0.005) after 28 days of oil pulling. The salivary pH remained in the neutral range throughout the study period. No significant difference in salivary pH was found between the two treatments. VCO pulling did not demonstrate any significant superior effect compared with PO pulling on the evaluated clinical parameters. However, because the oil pulling interventions were not compared to negative control in this study, further studies are needed to confirm the potentially beneficial effects of oil pulling. Keywords: Gingivitis, Oral health status, Mouth care product","PeriodicalId":132692,"journal":{"name":"Natural and Life Sciences Communications","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural and Life Sciences Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/nlsc.2023.053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this study was to compare the effects of oil pulling with virgin coconut oil (VCO), which contains antimicrobial ingredients, and with palm oil (PO) on several clinical parameters when used as adjunctive oral hygiene care in patients with gingival inflammation. In this crossover trial, thirty-six participants were randomized to group 1 to start with VCO and group 2 to start with PO pulling. The participants were instructed to continue their oral hygiene routine and to perform oil pulling by swishing 10 mL oil for 8 min for 28 days. After a 21-day wash-out period, the participants performed the protocol with the other oil type. The Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and salivary pH were recorded at baseline, the end of both intervention periods, and after the wash-out period. The before- and after-treatment values and the mean difference in the evaluated parameters in each group were compared. VCO pulling significantly reduced GI (P=0.004), while PO pulling significantly reduced GI (P=0.010) and PI (P=0.005) after 28 days of oil pulling. The salivary pH remained in the neutral range throughout the study period. No significant difference in salivary pH was found between the two treatments. VCO pulling did not demonstrate any significant superior effect compared with PO pulling on the evaluated clinical parameters. However, because the oil pulling interventions were not compared to negative control in this study, further studies are needed to confirm the potentially beneficial effects of oil pulling. Keywords: Gingivitis, Oral health status, Mouth care product
初榨椰子油拔牙与棕榈油拔牙对牙龈健康的临床效果比较:一项交叉随机临床对照试验
摘要本研究的目的是比较油拔法与含有抗菌成分的初榨椰子油(VCO)和棕榈油(PO)作为牙龈炎症患者辅助口腔卫生护理时,对多项临床参数的影响。在这项交叉试验中,36名参与者随机分为1组,从VCO开始,2组从PO拉起开始。参与者被要求继续他们的口腔卫生常规,并进行油拔,用10毫升油刷8分钟,持续28天。经过21天的洗脱期后,参与者使用另一种油类型执行该方案。在基线、干预期结束和洗脱期结束时记录牙龈指数(GI)、斑块指数(PI)和唾液pH值。比较各组治疗前后数值及评价参数的平均差值。抽油28 d后,VCO抽油显著降低GI (P=0.004), PO抽油显著降低GI (P=0.010)和PI (P=0.005)。在整个研究期间,唾液pH值保持在中性范围内。两组患者唾液pH值无显著差异。在评估的临床参数上,VCO牵引与PO牵引相比没有表现出任何显著的优势。然而,由于本研究没有将油拔干预与阴性对照进行比较,因此需要进一步的研究来证实油拔的潜在有益效果。关键词:牙龈炎,口腔健康状况,口腔护理产品
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信