Assessment of Volume and Above-Ground Biomass in Araucaria Forest Through Satellite Images, Comparing Different Methods in the South of Chile

F. Pirotti, E. Kutchartt, E. Csaplovics
{"title":"Assessment of Volume and Above-Ground Biomass in Araucaria Forest Through Satellite Images, Comparing Different Methods in the South of Chile","authors":"F. Pirotti, E. Kutchartt, E. Csaplovics","doi":"10.1109/LAGIRS48042.2020.9165668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Initial results of biomass estimation in the La Fusta area from existing equations found in literature are presented. As expected, accuracy of general equations suffer from the equation coefficients being obtained from fitting training data from different sites. It is also clear from the results that there is a high variance between different methods, in particular when complex data mixture is applied. Biomass is difficult to assess for dense forests, as pixels are saturated. This must be considered when planning field-data collection, with more samples in dense forest to provide more robust estimators from the training phase. The SAR-only (PALSAR) method from eq. 4 provided the most bias in results, overestimating with respect to the other methods.","PeriodicalId":111863,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference (LAGIRS)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Latin American GRSS & ISPRS Remote Sensing Conference (LAGIRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LAGIRS48042.2020.9165668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Initial results of biomass estimation in the La Fusta area from existing equations found in literature are presented. As expected, accuracy of general equations suffer from the equation coefficients being obtained from fitting training data from different sites. It is also clear from the results that there is a high variance between different methods, in particular when complex data mixture is applied. Biomass is difficult to assess for dense forests, as pixels are saturated. This must be considered when planning field-data collection, with more samples in dense forest to provide more robust estimators from the training phase. The SAR-only (PALSAR) method from eq. 4 provided the most bias in results, overestimating with respect to the other methods.
通过卫星图像评估智利南部Araucaria森林的体积和地上生物量,比较不同方法
从文献中发现的现有方程中提出了La Fusta地区生物量估算的初步结果。正如预期的那样,一般方程的准确性受到从不同地点的训练数据拟合得到的方程系数的影响。从结果中还可以清楚地看出,不同方法之间存在很大差异,特别是在应用复杂数据混合时。对于茂密的森林,生物量很难评估,因为像素是饱和的。在规划实地数据收集时必须考虑到这一点,在茂密的森林中提供更多的样本,以便在训练阶段提供更可靠的估计。eq. 4中的仅sar (PALSAR)方法在结果中提供了最大的偏差,相对于其他方法高估了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信