Learning to Read Music by Differences in Perception of Information

Misato Akiba, Wonseok Yang
{"title":"Learning to Read Music by Differences in Perception of Information","authors":"Misato Akiba, Wonseok Yang","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of information technology and devices has made it easier for everyone to take and share videos and photos, and many number of information has become available in the world. For example, when learning how to play a musical instrument, a game, or a household appliance, they can effectively understand it from videos and images on YouTube or Instagram, instead of reading an instruction manual or a reference book. Whereas the piano is difficult to practice efficiently because repetition and reading music are said to be the two most important elements needed to acquire the skill. Therefore, continuous practice is essential, but many people give up halfway. Focusing on reading music, we have to process multiple pieces of information on the score simultaneously in a short period of time while playing the piano. However, for beginners, it’s difficult to keep reading the necessary information from a score where information is concentrated in many symbols at the tempo of the performance. This research examines how to make it easier for beginners to recognize and remember information about music notation and how to use the information obtained more naturally. To this end, we clarified the process by which beginners learn and recognize information about musical notation in piano learning activities and clarified the characteristics that are expressed when they perform using the recognized knowledge.Firstly, we investigated whether learners would get support in an application whose purpose was to support reading practice. We found that the support could be categorized into three types, and that learning about pitch, rhythm, and keyboard position was important for beginners. To clarify the differences in these learning procedures depending on the level of proficiency, we conducted behavioral observations of beginners and experienced pianists practicing reading music, summarized their behavioral procedures into ordinal data, and conducted a Dematel analysis. As a result, we’re able to classify the level of proficiency into three levels: beginners (subjects with no piano experience), experienced (subjects with less than one year of piano study), and proficient (subjects with more than seven years of piano study). Based on the results of the questionnaire and interviews, we’re able to discover common issues such as beginners (1) not being able to practice smoothly because they couldn’t establish a procedure, (2) taking a long time to read the pitch of notes from the score, and (3) finding it difficult to read the rhythm from the score. From the above research, we examined new information display methods and innovations for the three types of information in music notation: pitch, rhythm, and sequence. In the case of pitch, it’s thought that information can be recognized efficiently by using the properties of color. For rhythm, we extracted information from the score and organized it in a new way, which reduced the error rate and led to more efficient practice. Also, with the information organized, even beginners were able to efficiently find the regularities and similarities in the score, which led to smooth read music.","PeriodicalId":164502,"journal":{"name":"Kansei Engineering","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansei Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The development of information technology and devices has made it easier for everyone to take and share videos and photos, and many number of information has become available in the world. For example, when learning how to play a musical instrument, a game, or a household appliance, they can effectively understand it from videos and images on YouTube or Instagram, instead of reading an instruction manual or a reference book. Whereas the piano is difficult to practice efficiently because repetition and reading music are said to be the two most important elements needed to acquire the skill. Therefore, continuous practice is essential, but many people give up halfway. Focusing on reading music, we have to process multiple pieces of information on the score simultaneously in a short period of time while playing the piano. However, for beginners, it’s difficult to keep reading the necessary information from a score where information is concentrated in many symbols at the tempo of the performance. This research examines how to make it easier for beginners to recognize and remember information about music notation and how to use the information obtained more naturally. To this end, we clarified the process by which beginners learn and recognize information about musical notation in piano learning activities and clarified the characteristics that are expressed when they perform using the recognized knowledge.Firstly, we investigated whether learners would get support in an application whose purpose was to support reading practice. We found that the support could be categorized into three types, and that learning about pitch, rhythm, and keyboard position was important for beginners. To clarify the differences in these learning procedures depending on the level of proficiency, we conducted behavioral observations of beginners and experienced pianists practicing reading music, summarized their behavioral procedures into ordinal data, and conducted a Dematel analysis. As a result, we’re able to classify the level of proficiency into three levels: beginners (subjects with no piano experience), experienced (subjects with less than one year of piano study), and proficient (subjects with more than seven years of piano study). Based on the results of the questionnaire and interviews, we’re able to discover common issues such as beginners (1) not being able to practice smoothly because they couldn’t establish a procedure, (2) taking a long time to read the pitch of notes from the score, and (3) finding it difficult to read the rhythm from the score. From the above research, we examined new information display methods and innovations for the three types of information in music notation: pitch, rhythm, and sequence. In the case of pitch, it’s thought that information can be recognized efficiently by using the properties of color. For rhythm, we extracted information from the score and organized it in a new way, which reduced the error rate and led to more efficient practice. Also, with the information organized, even beginners were able to efficiently find the regularities and similarities in the score, which led to smooth read music.
通过信息感知的差异来学习读音乐
信息技术和设备的发展使得每个人都可以更容易地拍摄和分享视频和照片,世界上有许多信息可供使用。例如,当学习如何演奏乐器,游戏或家用电器时,他们可以通过YouTube或Instagram上的视频和图像来有效地理解它,而不是阅读说明书或参考书。然而,钢琴很难有效地练习,因为重复和读谱被认为是获得技能所需的两个最重要的因素。因此,持续的练习是必不可少的,但许多人半途而废。专注于读谱,我们必须在弹钢琴的同时在短时间内同时处理乐谱上的多条信息。然而,对于初学者来说,在演奏的节奏中,信息集中在许多符号上,很难从乐谱中持续阅读必要的信息。本研究探讨如何使初学者更容易识别和记忆有关乐谱的信息,以及如何更自然地使用所获得的信息。为此,我们明确了初学者在钢琴学习活动中学习和认识乐谱信息的过程,并明确了他们在使用所学知识进行演奏时所表现出来的特点。首先,我们调查了学习者是否会在一个以支持阅读练习为目的的应用程序中获得支持。我们发现支持可以分为三种类型,学习音高,节奏和键盘位置对初学者来说很重要。为了弄清这些学习过程在不同熟练程度下的差异,我们对初学者和经验丰富的钢琴家进行了行为观察,将他们的行为过程归纳为有序数据,并进行了Dematel分析。因此,我们能够将熟练程度分为三个级别:初学者(没有钢琴经验的对象),经验(学习钢琴不到一年的对象)和精通(学习钢琴七年以上的对象)。根据问卷调查和访谈的结果,我们可以发现一些常见的问题,如初学者(1)由于无法建立程序而无法顺利练习,(2)从乐谱中读出音符的音高需要花费很长时间,(3)很难从乐谱中读出节奏。从上述研究中,我们考察了音高、节奏和序列这三种类型的音乐符号信息的新的信息显示方法和创新。以音高为例,人们认为利用颜色的特性可以有效地识别信息。对于节奏,我们从乐谱中提取信息,重新组织,减少了错误率,提高了练习的效率。而且,通过信息的组织,即使是初学者也能有效地找到乐谱中的规律和相似之处,从而使音乐读起来流畅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信