An introduction to intuition theory and practice: a summary and a research agenda

M. Sinclair
{"title":"An introduction to intuition theory and practice: a summary and a research agenda","authors":"M. Sinclair","doi":"10.4337/9781788979757.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Welcome to the third handbook in the intuition series by Edward Elgar Publishing. It took ten years to get to this point – and what a journey it has been. We celebrated a decade of annual intuition symposia at the Academy of Management meeting last year, where new collaborations were struck and innovative approaches to intuition research explored. It confirms that intuition is gradually entering the mainstream, as theorists and practitioners alike call for new ways to conduct business and survive in the twenty-first century. It also shows that the initial research has shifted from our original narrow focus on expert intuition using psychology-based tools to a broader investigation of topics that includes a variety of qualitative methods to offer additional richness and depth. Work in the expert stream continues on a more fine-grained scale but it is complemented by insights from other streams and disciplines, reaching as far as neuroscience, quantum physics or clinical studies. Finally, more empirical work started emerging. This does not mean that all conceptual differences have been reconciled but there is a sufficient consensus to move forward under the original premise of our intuition community to ‘agree to respectfully disagree.’ This overall development has been reflected in the progression of topics covered in the handbooks. While the first volume addressed mostly conceptual issues, the second volume reviewed an array of applicable methods underpinned by conceptual considerations. Now, with the third volume, it is time to explore what is happening at the workplace and how we can capture it for practice. This is in response to the growing concern about the existing gap between theory and practice. While new intuition theories are being developed and (sometimes) tested, very few of them are converted into practical training tools. On the other hand, intuition practitioners find it challenging to explain what works for them and their clients by the existing theory. A question arises whether these parallel views can be somehow reconciled for the benefit of all. The current handbook takes the first step in this direction. It was quite challenging to organize the included chapters into individual parts. Many of them contain several themes that bind the whole book together, making their categorization somewhat arbitrary. At the same time, this is encouraging. The fact that some contributions could be placed under multiple headings resonates with the conclusion that intuition does not function in isolation but tends to be integrated with other processes, prevalent in a multitude of professional settings. Interestingly, most of these have been discussed at the intuition symposia since the last handbook. One common theme is the interaction of intuition and reasoning, although for the latter some researchers use different terms that do not always fully overlap, such as rationality, deliberation or analysis. Sadly, this phenomenon is still mostly investigated in the context of decision making, which seems to be the dominant research focus of this handbook. Not enough attention has been paid to problem solving so far,","PeriodicalId":428236,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Intuition Research as Practice","volume":"234 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Intuition Research as Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788979757.00006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Welcome to the third handbook in the intuition series by Edward Elgar Publishing. It took ten years to get to this point – and what a journey it has been. We celebrated a decade of annual intuition symposia at the Academy of Management meeting last year, where new collaborations were struck and innovative approaches to intuition research explored. It confirms that intuition is gradually entering the mainstream, as theorists and practitioners alike call for new ways to conduct business and survive in the twenty-first century. It also shows that the initial research has shifted from our original narrow focus on expert intuition using psychology-based tools to a broader investigation of topics that includes a variety of qualitative methods to offer additional richness and depth. Work in the expert stream continues on a more fine-grained scale but it is complemented by insights from other streams and disciplines, reaching as far as neuroscience, quantum physics or clinical studies. Finally, more empirical work started emerging. This does not mean that all conceptual differences have been reconciled but there is a sufficient consensus to move forward under the original premise of our intuition community to ‘agree to respectfully disagree.’ This overall development has been reflected in the progression of topics covered in the handbooks. While the first volume addressed mostly conceptual issues, the second volume reviewed an array of applicable methods underpinned by conceptual considerations. Now, with the third volume, it is time to explore what is happening at the workplace and how we can capture it for practice. This is in response to the growing concern about the existing gap between theory and practice. While new intuition theories are being developed and (sometimes) tested, very few of them are converted into practical training tools. On the other hand, intuition practitioners find it challenging to explain what works for them and their clients by the existing theory. A question arises whether these parallel views can be somehow reconciled for the benefit of all. The current handbook takes the first step in this direction. It was quite challenging to organize the included chapters into individual parts. Many of them contain several themes that bind the whole book together, making their categorization somewhat arbitrary. At the same time, this is encouraging. The fact that some contributions could be placed under multiple headings resonates with the conclusion that intuition does not function in isolation but tends to be integrated with other processes, prevalent in a multitude of professional settings. Interestingly, most of these have been discussed at the intuition symposia since the last handbook. One common theme is the interaction of intuition and reasoning, although for the latter some researchers use different terms that do not always fully overlap, such as rationality, deliberation or analysis. Sadly, this phenomenon is still mostly investigated in the context of decision making, which seems to be the dominant research focus of this handbook. Not enough attention has been paid to problem solving so far,
直觉理论与实践导论:摘要与研究议程
欢迎阅读Edward Elgar出版的直觉系列的第三本手册。我们花了十年时间才走到这一步——这是一段多么漫长的旅程啊。去年,我们在美国管理学会(Academy of Management)的年度直觉研讨会上庆祝了十年,会上达成了新的合作,探索了直觉研究的创新方法。它证实了直觉正逐渐进入主流,因为理论家和实践者都在呼吁在21世纪开展业务和生存的新方法。它还表明,最初的研究已经从我们最初使用基于心理学的工具对专家直觉的狭隘关注转向了更广泛的主题调查,其中包括各种定性方法,以提供额外的丰富性和深度。专家流的工作继续在更细粒度的规模上进行,但它得到了其他流和学科的见解的补充,远至神经科学、量子物理学或临床研究。最后,更多的实证研究开始出现。这并不意味着所有概念上的差异已经被调和,但在我们直觉共同体的原始前提下,有足够的共识来向前推进,即“尊重地同意不同意”。“这一总体发展反映在手册所涵盖主题的进展中。虽然第一卷主要讨论概念问题,但第二卷审查了一系列以概念考虑为基础的适用方法。现在,在第三卷中,是时候探索工作场所正在发生的事情以及我们如何将其用于实践。这是对人们日益关注理论与实践之间存在差距的回应。虽然新的直觉理论正在被开发和(有时)测试,但它们很少被转化为实用的培训工具。另一方面,直觉实践者发现用现有的理论来解释什么对他们和他们的客户有效是很有挑战性的。问题是,为了所有人的利益,这些平行的观点能否以某种方式调和。当前的手册向这个方向迈出了第一步。将包含的章节组织成单独的部分是相当具有挑战性的。其中许多包含几个主题,这些主题将整本书结合在一起,使它们的分类有些武断。与此同时,这也是令人鼓舞的。有些贡献可以放在多个标题下,这一事实与以下结论产生了共鸣:直觉不是孤立地发挥作用,而是往往与其他过程相结合,在许多专业环境中普遍存在。有趣的是,自上一本手册出版以来,这些问题中的大多数已经在直觉研讨会上讨论过了。一个共同的主题是直觉和推理的相互作用,尽管对于后者,一些研究人员使用不同的术语,但并不总是完全重叠,比如理性、审议或分析。可悲的是,这种现象仍然主要是在决策的背景下进行调查,这似乎是本手册的主要研究重点。迄今为止,对问题的解决还没有给予足够的重视,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信