In Defense of Snooping Employers

Jessica Fink
{"title":"In Defense of Snooping Employers","authors":"Jessica Fink","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2293121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent months, a plethora of states have turned their legislative attention to protecting employee privacy in the workplace, focusing specifically on passing state laws that protect the \"social media privacy\" of individuals in their states. Indeed, discussions of workplace privacy are everywhere nowadays: Media stories condemn employers’ efforts to monitor their employees’ email, Internet and telephone usage. Employees rage about perceived invasions of their privacy. Politicians heatedly debate how to limit employers’ prying conduct, passing laws designed to reign in certain types of monitoring by employers. At the same time, employers also find themselves perplexed, as they grapple with how they can gather the information that they need to make important business decisions within an environment that views such efforts with disdain. In a world where technological advancements have made it easier than ever to collect massive amounts of information about those in the workforce and where employers feel an increasing need to collect such information, looming questions continue to exist regarding the proper scope and limits of employees’ privacy.This article represents one effort to answer these questions while taking the employers’ perspective into account, explaining both the motivations behind and justifications for employers’ efforts to \"snoop\" into their employees’ private lives. The article describes the means through which employers gather information about their employees, including through some recent, rather novel approaches to collecting such data. In addition, this article discusses the financial, legal and practical concerns that motivate employers to snoop in the first place, arguing that employers engage in this conduct for what frequently amount to very legitimate reasons. More significantly, this article places substantial responsibility for employer snooping with the courts themselves, highlighting particular decisions and doctrines that not only permit, but in fact encourage, employers to engage in these efforts to monitor employees. At bottom, this paper attempts to put the \"problem\" of employer snooping into a broader context. While employers certainly should not have access to every aspect of their prospective and current employees’ private lives, and while abuses of the boundaries undoubtedly exist, much of the snooping behavior for which employers have been condemned represents more than just senseless meddling, but rather is part of a sound business plan designed to protect employers, employees and the public at large.","PeriodicalId":219760,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2293121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In recent months, a plethora of states have turned their legislative attention to protecting employee privacy in the workplace, focusing specifically on passing state laws that protect the "social media privacy" of individuals in their states. Indeed, discussions of workplace privacy are everywhere nowadays: Media stories condemn employers’ efforts to monitor their employees’ email, Internet and telephone usage. Employees rage about perceived invasions of their privacy. Politicians heatedly debate how to limit employers’ prying conduct, passing laws designed to reign in certain types of monitoring by employers. At the same time, employers also find themselves perplexed, as they grapple with how they can gather the information that they need to make important business decisions within an environment that views such efforts with disdain. In a world where technological advancements have made it easier than ever to collect massive amounts of information about those in the workforce and where employers feel an increasing need to collect such information, looming questions continue to exist regarding the proper scope and limits of employees’ privacy.This article represents one effort to answer these questions while taking the employers’ perspective into account, explaining both the motivations behind and justifications for employers’ efforts to "snoop" into their employees’ private lives. The article describes the means through which employers gather information about their employees, including through some recent, rather novel approaches to collecting such data. In addition, this article discusses the financial, legal and practical concerns that motivate employers to snoop in the first place, arguing that employers engage in this conduct for what frequently amount to very legitimate reasons. More significantly, this article places substantial responsibility for employer snooping with the courts themselves, highlighting particular decisions and doctrines that not only permit, but in fact encourage, employers to engage in these efforts to monitor employees. At bottom, this paper attempts to put the "problem" of employer snooping into a broader context. While employers certainly should not have access to every aspect of their prospective and current employees’ private lives, and while abuses of the boundaries undoubtedly exist, much of the snooping behavior for which employers have been condemned represents more than just senseless meddling, but rather is part of a sound business plan designed to protect employers, employees and the public at large.
为窥探雇主辩护
最近几个月,许多州将立法注意力转向保护员工在工作场所的隐私,特别关注通过州法律来保护本州个人的“社交媒体隐私”。事实上,如今关于工作场所隐私的讨论无处不在:媒体报道谴责雇主监控员工电子邮件、互联网和电话使用的行为。员工对他们的隐私被侵犯感到愤怒。政客们就如何限制雇主的窥探行为展开了激烈的辩论,通过了旨在控制雇主某些类型监控的法律。与此同时,雇主们也发现自己很困惑,因为他们在一个对这种努力不屑一顾的环境中,如何才能收集到做出重要商业决策所需的信息。在一个技术进步使得收集大量劳动力信息比以往任何时候都更容易的世界里,雇主也越来越需要收集这些信息,关于员工隐私的适当范围和限制的隐现问题仍然存在。这篇文章试图回答这些问题,同时考虑到雇主的观点,解释雇主“窥探”员工私生活的动机和理由。这篇文章描述了雇主收集雇员信息的方法,包括一些最近的、相当新颖的收集这些数据的方法。此外,这篇文章首先讨论了激励雇主窥探的财务、法律和实际问题,认为雇主从事这种行为通常是出于非常合理的原因。更重要的是,这篇文章将雇主窥探员工的重大责任推给了法院本身,强调了某些决定和原则,这些决定和原则不仅允许,而且实际上鼓励雇主参与这些监视员工的努力。说到底,本文试图将雇主窥探的“问题”置于更广泛的背景下。虽然雇主当然不应该接触到未来和现在雇员的私人生活的方方面面,虽然滥用边界的行为无疑存在,但雇主受到谴责的许多窥探行为不仅仅是毫无意义的干预,而是旨在保护雇主、雇员和广大公众的健全商业计划的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信