Weaponized Pathogens and the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic

John W. Oller, Jr.
{"title":"Weaponized Pathogens and the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic","authors":"John W. Oller, Jr.","doi":"10.56098/ijvtpr.v1i2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review zeros in on the aspect of vaccine theory, practice, and research that is the most dangerous, the most controversial, and that is at the epicenter of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 “pandemic”. Regardless whether the “pandemic” itself is real or an illusion manufactured out of fear by vested interests, it is central to ethics and policy discussions seeking to understand bioweapons research in general. The official involvement of the USA in civilian bioweapons research dates at least from World War II under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The historical records, cloaked in secrecy until after the Anthrax mailing of 2001, reveal an intimate connection to vaccine research and development, its governmental protection from public scrutiny, and from citizen initiated lawsuits. It is an industry that has released dangerous weaponized pathogens by accident and by sinister designs supposedly compensated in the peace-loving nations by unrealistic hopes in non-existent counter-measures for outbreaks, including epidemiological tracking after the fact, vaccines being researched to counter the weaponization of pathogens being studied, immunity enhancing drugs, and downstream hoped for blood sera containing antibodies. Critical questions concern the ratio of real-risks to hoped-for-benefits, the “mitigating” measures “governments” (especially in the USA) have supposedly established to prevent pandemic outbreaks from bioweapons research, and how all that has played out in the instance of SARS-CoV-2.","PeriodicalId":391540,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research","volume":"17 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56098/ijvtpr.v1i2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This review zeros in on the aspect of vaccine theory, practice, and research that is the most dangerous, the most controversial, and that is at the epicenter of the alleged SARS-CoV-2 “pandemic”. Regardless whether the “pandemic” itself is real or an illusion manufactured out of fear by vested interests, it is central to ethics and policy discussions seeking to understand bioweapons research in general. The official involvement of the USA in civilian bioweapons research dates at least from World War II under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The historical records, cloaked in secrecy until after the Anthrax mailing of 2001, reveal an intimate connection to vaccine research and development, its governmental protection from public scrutiny, and from citizen initiated lawsuits. It is an industry that has released dangerous weaponized pathogens by accident and by sinister designs supposedly compensated in the peace-loving nations by unrealistic hopes in non-existent counter-measures for outbreaks, including epidemiological tracking after the fact, vaccines being researched to counter the weaponization of pathogens being studied, immunity enhancing drugs, and downstream hoped for blood sera containing antibodies. Critical questions concern the ratio of real-risks to hoped-for-benefits, the “mitigating” measures “governments” (especially in the USA) have supposedly established to prevent pandemic outbreaks from bioweapons research, and how all that has played out in the instance of SARS-CoV-2.
武器化病原体与SARS-CoV-2大流行
这篇综述的重点是疫苗理论、实践和研究中最危险、最具争议的方面,也是所谓的SARS-CoV-2“大流行”的中心。无论“大流行”本身是真实的还是既得利益者出于恐惧而制造的幻觉,它都是寻求从总体上理解生物武器研究的伦理和政策讨论的核心。美国官方对民用生物武器研究的参与至少可以追溯到富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福总统领导的第二次世界大战。在2001年炭疽邮件事件发生之前,这些历史记录一直处于保密状态,揭示了与疫苗研发的密切联系,以及政府对其的保护,使其免受公众监督和公民发起的诉讼。这个行业无意中释放了危险的武器化病原体,并通过邪恶的设计在爱好和平的国家中被不切实际的希望所补偿,这些希望是对不存在的爆发对策的不切实际的希望,包括事后的流行病学追踪,正在研究的疫苗以对抗正在研究的武器化病原体,增强免疫力的药物,以及下游希望含有抗体的血清。关键问题涉及实际风险与期望收益的比例,“政府”(尤其是美国)为防止生物武器研究引发的大流行而制定的“缓解”措施,以及所有这些措施在SARS-CoV-2的情况下是如何发挥作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信