Lymph Node Yield in Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study

A. Abdalla
{"title":"Lymph Node Yield in Open vs. Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study","authors":"A. Abdalla","doi":"10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/3312f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to compare the lymph node yield between open and laparoscopic technique using 12 lymph node as standard for oncological resection. Laparoscopic surgery is standard treatment for colorectal cancer in the last decade of surgery’s history. Nowadays open surgery for CRC indicated only for certain cases. with evolving of laparoscopic instruments and adoption of laparoscopic and robotic techniques by new generation of surgeons open surgery started to vanish gradually as standard care in all world well equipped hospitals and centers . Short and long term advantages of laparoscopic approach manifested in it is minimum invasive technique and less sequelae of wound healing respectively, but in CRC surgical procedures staging and eradication of neoplasm have great impact in survival and morbidity outcome. This study compare laparoscopic with open surgical technique for CRC using lymph node yield as oncological determinant factor for prognosis and need for further treatment. The study support laparoscopic CRC procedure as it have better oncological outcome when compared to open procedure using lymph node yield as single oncological factor, certain cases like; T4 colorectal cancer, locally advanced tumour, medical conditions and obstructed CRC might need open procedure.","PeriodicalId":231604,"journal":{"name":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Frontiers in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 7","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/nfmmr/v7/3312f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the lymph node yield between open and laparoscopic technique using 12 lymph node as standard for oncological resection. Laparoscopic surgery is standard treatment for colorectal cancer in the last decade of surgery’s history. Nowadays open surgery for CRC indicated only for certain cases. with evolving of laparoscopic instruments and adoption of laparoscopic and robotic techniques by new generation of surgeons open surgery started to vanish gradually as standard care in all world well equipped hospitals and centers . Short and long term advantages of laparoscopic approach manifested in it is minimum invasive technique and less sequelae of wound healing respectively, but in CRC surgical procedures staging and eradication of neoplasm have great impact in survival and morbidity outcome. This study compare laparoscopic with open surgical technique for CRC using lymph node yield as oncological determinant factor for prognosis and need for further treatment. The study support laparoscopic CRC procedure as it have better oncological outcome when compared to open procedure using lymph node yield as single oncological factor, certain cases like; T4 colorectal cancer, locally advanced tumour, medical conditions and obstructed CRC might need open procedure.
结直肠癌开放与腹腔镜手术的淋巴结产量:一项回顾性观察研究
本研究的目的是比较以12个淋巴结作为肿瘤切除标准的开放和腹腔镜技术的淋巴结产量。在过去十年的手术历史中,腹腔镜手术是结肠直肠癌的标准治疗方法。目前开放手术治疗结直肠癌仅适用于某些病例。随着腹腔镜设备的发展以及新一代外科医生对腹腔镜和机器人技术的采用,开放手术开始逐渐消失,成为世界上所有装备精良的医院和中心的标准治疗。腹腔镜入路的短期和长期优势分别表现为微创技术和创伤愈合后遗症少,但在结直肠癌手术中,肿瘤的分期和根除对患者的生存和发病结局有很大影响。本研究比较了腹腔镜和开放手术治疗结直肠癌的方法,将淋巴结的数量作为预后和进一步治疗的肿瘤决定因素。该研究支持腹腔镜结直肠癌手术,因为与以淋巴结产量为单一肿瘤因素的开放式手术相比,腹腔镜结直肠癌手术具有更好的肿瘤预后,某些病例如;T4结肠直肠癌,局部晚期肿瘤,医疗条件和梗阻的CRC可能需要开放手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信