Improving Data Collection With In-Line Inspection in Low-Pressure Gas Distribution Networks

Johannes Becker, C. Richards, Guenter Sundag, Ronald Wittig
{"title":"Improving Data Collection With In-Line Inspection in Low-Pressure Gas Distribution Networks","authors":"Johannes Becker, C. Richards, Guenter Sundag, Ronald Wittig","doi":"10.1115/IPC2020-9481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A large majority of urban gas distribution pipelines are designed to accommodate future integrity management surveys with in-line inspection (ILI) tools. However, even with typical inspection design parameters considered, many pipelines end up on a “difficult-to-inspect” list and/or fall into a “gray” zone. Often this is due to operational parameters, which may have adverse effects on how in-line inspection technologies perform during a survey. One of these effects may be stop-start behaviors of the tool itself. Although most segments meet minimum technical specifications to conduct ILI surveys, vintage pipeline design practices, such as numerous 1.5D bends, multiple heavy wall transitions, and narrow ID fittings, consistently present ongoing issues when running ILI tools in gas distribution lines. The first assessment characteristically indicates that standard inspection tools are viable solutions for these types of pipelines, but results from previous inspections typically indicate, after the first inspection of the pipeline, that standard technologies should not be applied, or rather, do not deliver satisfactory results. New methodologies and technologies are required to reduce, if not eliminate, the incidents of stationary tools and the resultant areas of degraded data while improving overall data quality.\n In the end, operators consider these lines a critically important component of their entire system and are keen to gain a clear picture of the assets’ integrity. Suitable in-line inspection solutions are therefore in demand to instill confidence in the assets safe and efficient operation.\n This paper outlines several elements, including technologies, procedures, or mechanical adaptations, that are often overlooked when selecting and applying inspection and/or cleaning technologies to these gray-zone pipelines. Applying these elements may allow for inspection tools to traverse various obstacles and debris fields encountered while still providing high-resolution data sets.\n A detailed case study of a NPS 08” pipeline will be used to support the content. This pipeline did not provide the required operational parameters to gather acceptable data when utilizing standard ILI technologies.\n This NPS 08” line contained various challenges, such as:\n • Unknown or unreliable pipeline information, specifically for bend radii and wall thicknesses\n • No previous cleaning and inspection records\n • Low operational pressures of 1000 to 2100 kPa\n • Pipeline length over 100 km\n • MOP restrictions did not allow for higher pressures\n • Flow rate was only available within limited windows\n • Cleanliness was unknown and assumed to be a concern\n • Pipe grade documentation required verification\n Many technical challenges were encountered in the initial stages of the project. The lessons learned will be discussed and outlined to better support the approach chosen. In the end, tailored geometry and low-friction MFL technologies, capable of safely traversing the pipeline and gathering high-quality data, were utilized for the inspection. This case study will provide other operators valuable insights into how to inspect similar assets while also outlining specialized technologies suited to support the inspection.","PeriodicalId":273758,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A large majority of urban gas distribution pipelines are designed to accommodate future integrity management surveys with in-line inspection (ILI) tools. However, even with typical inspection design parameters considered, many pipelines end up on a “difficult-to-inspect” list and/or fall into a “gray” zone. Often this is due to operational parameters, which may have adverse effects on how in-line inspection technologies perform during a survey. One of these effects may be stop-start behaviors of the tool itself. Although most segments meet minimum technical specifications to conduct ILI surveys, vintage pipeline design practices, such as numerous 1.5D bends, multiple heavy wall transitions, and narrow ID fittings, consistently present ongoing issues when running ILI tools in gas distribution lines. The first assessment characteristically indicates that standard inspection tools are viable solutions for these types of pipelines, but results from previous inspections typically indicate, after the first inspection of the pipeline, that standard technologies should not be applied, or rather, do not deliver satisfactory results. New methodologies and technologies are required to reduce, if not eliminate, the incidents of stationary tools and the resultant areas of degraded data while improving overall data quality. In the end, operators consider these lines a critically important component of their entire system and are keen to gain a clear picture of the assets’ integrity. Suitable in-line inspection solutions are therefore in demand to instill confidence in the assets safe and efficient operation. This paper outlines several elements, including technologies, procedures, or mechanical adaptations, that are often overlooked when selecting and applying inspection and/or cleaning technologies to these gray-zone pipelines. Applying these elements may allow for inspection tools to traverse various obstacles and debris fields encountered while still providing high-resolution data sets. A detailed case study of a NPS 08” pipeline will be used to support the content. This pipeline did not provide the required operational parameters to gather acceptable data when utilizing standard ILI technologies. This NPS 08” line contained various challenges, such as: • Unknown or unreliable pipeline information, specifically for bend radii and wall thicknesses • No previous cleaning and inspection records • Low operational pressures of 1000 to 2100 kPa • Pipeline length over 100 km • MOP restrictions did not allow for higher pressures • Flow rate was only available within limited windows • Cleanliness was unknown and assumed to be a concern • Pipe grade documentation required verification Many technical challenges were encountered in the initial stages of the project. The lessons learned will be discussed and outlined to better support the approach chosen. In the end, tailored geometry and low-friction MFL technologies, capable of safely traversing the pipeline and gathering high-quality data, were utilized for the inspection. This case study will provide other operators valuable insights into how to inspect similar assets while also outlining specialized technologies suited to support the inspection.
改进低压配气网络在线检测数据采集
绝大多数城市燃气分配管道的设计都是为了适应未来使用在线检查(ILI)工具进行完整性管理调查。然而,即使考虑到典型的检查设计参数,许多管道最终也会被列入“难以检查”的名单和/或落入“灰色”地带。这通常是由于操作参数,这可能会对在线检测技术在测量过程中的表现产生不利影响。这些影响之一可能是工具本身的启停行为。尽管大多数管段满足进行ILI调查的最低技术规范,但传统的管道设计实践,如大量1.5D弯道、多个厚壁过渡和窄内径接头,在天然气分配管道中使用ILI工具时,始终存在持续存在的问题。第一次评估的特点是表明标准检查工具是这些类型管道的可行解决方案,但是先前检查的结果通常表明,在管道的第一次检查之后,不应该应用标准技术,或者更确切地说,不能提供令人满意的结果。需要新的方法和技术来减少(如果不能消除的话)固定工具事件和由此产生的数据退化区域,同时提高总体数据质量。最后,作业者认为这些管线是整个系统中至关重要的组成部分,并渴望获得资产完整性的清晰图像。因此,需要合适的在线检测解决方案,以增强对资产安全高效运行的信心。本文概述了在选择和应用检测和/或清洁技术时经常被忽视的几个要素,包括技术、程序或机械适应性。应用这些元素可以允许检查工具穿越遇到的各种障碍物和碎片场,同时仍然提供高分辨率的数据集。将使用NPS 08管道的详细案例研究来支持内容。当使用标准ILI技术时,该管道不能提供所需的操作参数来收集可接受的数据。这条NPS 08“线包含各种挑战,例如:•未知或不可靠的管道信息;•没有之前的清洁和检查记录•1000至2100千帕的低工作压力•管道长度超过100公里•MOP限制不允许更高的压力•流量仅在有限的窗口内可用•清洁度未知并被认为是一个问题•管道等级文件需要验证在项目的初始阶段遇到了许多技术挑战。将讨论和概述吸取的经验教训,以便更好地支持所选择的方法。最后,利用定制的几何形状和低摩擦的MFL技术,能够安全地穿过管道并收集高质量的数据,进行了检查。该案例研究将为其他作业者提供有价值的见解,帮助他们了解如何检查类似的资产,同时概述适合于支持检查的专业技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信