Evaluation of Joint Modeling Techniques for Node Embedding and Community Detection on Graphs

Simon Hiel, Lore Nicolaers, Carlos Ortega Vázquez, Sandra Mitrovic, B. Baesens, Jochen De Weerdt
{"title":"Evaluation of Joint Modeling Techniques for Node Embedding and Community Detection on Graphs","authors":"Simon Hiel, Lore Nicolaers, Carlos Ortega Vázquez, Sandra Mitrovic, B. Baesens, Jochen De Weerdt","doi":"10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Novel joint techniques capture both the microscopic context and the mesoscopic structure of networks by leveraging two previously separated fields of research: node representation learning (NRL) and community detection (CD). However, several limitations exist in the literature. First, a comprehensive comparison between these joint NRL-CD techniques is non-existent. Second, baseline techniques, datasets, evaluation metrics, and classification algorithms differ significantly between each method. Thirdly, the literature lacks a synchronized experimental approach, thus rendering comparison between these methods strenuous. To overcome these limitations, we present a uni-fied experimental setup mutually comparing six joint NRL-CD techniques and comparing them with corresponding NRL/CD baselines in three different settings: non-overlapping and over-lapping CD and node classification. Our results show that joint methods underperform on the node classification task but achieve relatively solid results for overlapping community detection. Our research contribution is two-fold: first, we show specific weaknesses of selected joint techniques in different tasks and data sets; and second, we suggest a more thorough experimental setup to benchmark joint techniques with simpler NRL and CD techniques.","PeriodicalId":423113,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Novel joint techniques capture both the microscopic context and the mesoscopic structure of networks by leveraging two previously separated fields of research: node representation learning (NRL) and community detection (CD). However, several limitations exist in the literature. First, a comprehensive comparison between these joint NRL-CD techniques is non-existent. Second, baseline techniques, datasets, evaluation metrics, and classification algorithms differ significantly between each method. Thirdly, the literature lacks a synchronized experimental approach, thus rendering comparison between these methods strenuous. To overcome these limitations, we present a uni-fied experimental setup mutually comparing six joint NRL-CD techniques and comparing them with corresponding NRL/CD baselines in three different settings: non-overlapping and over-lapping CD and node classification. Our results show that joint methods underperform on the node classification task but achieve relatively solid results for overlapping community detection. Our research contribution is two-fold: first, we show specific weaknesses of selected joint techniques in different tasks and data sets; and second, we suggest a more thorough experimental setup to benchmark joint techniques with simpler NRL and CD techniques.
图上节点嵌入和社区检测联合建模技术的评价
新的联合技术通过利用两个先前分离的研究领域:节点表示学习(NRL)和社区检测(CD)来捕获网络的微观背景和中观结构。然而,文献中存在一些局限性。首先,不存在对这些联合NRL-CD技术的全面比较。其次,基线技术、数据集、评估指标和分类算法在每种方法之间存在显著差异。第三,文献缺乏同步的实验方法,使得这些方法之间的比较比较困难。为了克服这些限制,我们提出了一个统一的实验设置,相互比较六种联合NRL-CD技术,并将它们与相应的NRL/CD基线在三种不同的设置下进行比较:非重叠和重叠CD和节点分类。我们的研究结果表明,联合方法在节点分类任务上表现不佳,但在重叠社区检测上取得了相对可靠的结果。我们的研究贡献有两个方面:首先,我们展示了在不同的任务和数据集中所选择的联合技术的具体弱点;其次,我们建议更彻底的实验设置,以更简单的NRL和CD技术对关节技术进行基准测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信