Validating and improving an existing software architectural evaluation process

Tristan Everitt, R. Tvedt, John D. Tvedt
{"title":"Validating and improving an existing software architectural evaluation process","authors":"Tristan Everitt, R. Tvedt, John D. Tvedt","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2004.1357827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is inevitable that most software systems will undergo continuous changes, increasing the risk of architectural degeneration. Several software architectural evaluation processes attempt to address architectural issues from various perspectives and assist to mitigate the risk of architectural degeneration. This paper describes enhancements made to an existing software architecture evaluation process and presents the results of a case study conducted using the improved process. The results suggest that the enhanced software architecture evaluation process is more broadly applicable than the previous version. It is believed that this process would be effective with systems utilizing various architectural styles and design patterns.","PeriodicalId":348668,"journal":{"name":"20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2004.1357827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is inevitable that most software systems will undergo continuous changes, increasing the risk of architectural degeneration. Several software architectural evaluation processes attempt to address architectural issues from various perspectives and assist to mitigate the risk of architectural degeneration. This paper describes enhancements made to an existing software architecture evaluation process and presents the results of a case study conducted using the improved process. The results suggest that the enhanced software architecture evaluation process is more broadly applicable than the previous version. It is believed that this process would be effective with systems utilizing various architectural styles and design patterns.
验证和改进现有的软件架构评估过程
大多数软件系统将不可避免地经历持续的变更,从而增加了架构退化的风险。几个软件体系结构评估过程试图从不同的角度解决体系结构问题,并帮助减轻体系结构退化的风险。本文描述了对现有软件架构评估过程的增强,并展示了使用改进后的过程进行的案例研究的结果。结果表明,改进后的软件体系结构评估过程比以前的版本具有更广泛的适用性。相信这个过程对于使用各种架构风格和设计模式的系统是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信