The Alternative

J. Le Grand
{"title":"The Alternative","authors":"J. Le Grand","doi":"10.4324/9780429486852-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feb. 2004 Vol. XXX No. 3 Dear Reader, This current issue of the Newsletter is on Sexual Partnership, Marriage and Family. The first essay concerns the decline of marriage and why fewer people choose to be married. The second essay is about the movement to open the benefits of marriage to gay people. The third essay tries to mediate this paradox. If marriage is less desirable for heterosexual people or is not living up to its promises, why are homosexual people so intent on joining a failing institution? The third essay argues that the focus on marriage is misplaced. The dividing line should not be between single and married but between parents and non-parents.","PeriodicalId":425000,"journal":{"name":"The Strategy of Equality","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Strategy of Equality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429486852-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feb. 2004 Vol. XXX No. 3 Dear Reader, This current issue of the Newsletter is on Sexual Partnership, Marriage and Family. The first essay concerns the decline of marriage and why fewer people choose to be married. The second essay is about the movement to open the benefits of marriage to gay people. The third essay tries to mediate this paradox. If marriage is less desirable for heterosexual people or is not living up to its promises, why are homosexual people so intent on joining a failing institution? The third essay argues that the focus on marriage is misplaced. The dividing line should not be between single and married but between parents and non-parents.
另一种选择
2004年2月XXX卷第3期亲爱的读者:本期通讯的主题是性伙伴关系、婚姻与家庭。第一篇文章关注的是婚姻的衰落以及为什么选择结婚的人越来越少。第二篇文章是关于向同性恋者开放婚姻福利的运动。第三篇文章试图调解这一悖论。如果异性恋者不喜欢婚姻,或者婚姻没有兑现承诺,为什么同性恋者如此热衷于加入一个失败的机构?第三篇文章认为,对婚姻的关注是错误的。分界线不应该是单身和已婚之间,而应该是有父母和没有父母之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信