Relevant Expertise Aggregation for Policy Selection in Collective Adaptive Systems

J. Pitt, Rui P. Cardoso, E. Hart, Josiah Ober
{"title":"Relevant Expertise Aggregation for Policy Selection in Collective Adaptive Systems","authors":"J. Pitt, Rui P. Cardoso, E. Hart, Josiah Ober","doi":"10.1109/FAS-W.2018.00038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many applications of collective adaptive systems for the digital transformation or digital society will necessarily be multi-functional; that is, the collective, as it adapts over time, will be required to resolve many and different types of problem. However, a long-standing issue for political theorists has been whether a decentralised problem-solving regime can be both 'democratic' and 'epistemic', i.e.\\ is it possible to devise decision-making and action-determination processes that take into account both majority preference and expert judgement. In this paper, we address this issue in the context of engineering long-lived and sustainable collective adaptive systems, in which autonomous agents adapt conventional rules in order to be congruent with changes in their operating environment. Based on a preliminary proof of concept and inspiration from political science, we propose a reference architecture for relevant expertise aggregation. We conclude that this is one possible design solution to the problem of enabling an collective to assume direct responsibility for adaptation or adoption of problem-solving policies at a large scale, over long periods of time, and addressing diverse problem types.","PeriodicalId":164903,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 3rd International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 3rd International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2018.00038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many applications of collective adaptive systems for the digital transformation or digital society will necessarily be multi-functional; that is, the collective, as it adapts over time, will be required to resolve many and different types of problem. However, a long-standing issue for political theorists has been whether a decentralised problem-solving regime can be both 'democratic' and 'epistemic', i.e.\ is it possible to devise decision-making and action-determination processes that take into account both majority preference and expert judgement. In this paper, we address this issue in the context of engineering long-lived and sustainable collective adaptive systems, in which autonomous agents adapt conventional rules in order to be congruent with changes in their operating environment. Based on a preliminary proof of concept and inspiration from political science, we propose a reference architecture for relevant expertise aggregation. We conclude that this is one possible design solution to the problem of enabling an collective to assume direct responsibility for adaptation or adoption of problem-solving policies at a large scale, over long periods of time, and addressing diverse problem types.
集体适应系统中政策选择的相关专家聚集
在数字化转型或数字化社会中,集体适应系统的许多应用必然是多功能的;也就是说,随着时间的推移,集体将需要解决许多不同类型的问题。然而,对于政治理论家来说,一个长期存在的问题是,一个分散的问题解决机制是否可以同时是“民主的”和“认识论的”,也就是说,是否有可能设计出考虑到多数人偏好和专家判断的决策和行动确定过程。在本文中,我们在工程长寿命和可持续的集体适应系统的背景下解决了这个问题,其中自主代理适应传统规则,以便与其操作环境的变化保持一致。基于概念的初步证明和来自政治学的启发,我们提出了一个相关专业知识聚合的参考架构。我们的结论是,这是一种可能的设计解决方案,可以使集体承担直接责任,大规模地、长时间地适应或采用解决问题的政策,并解决不同类型的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信