Effect of Water Deficit at different Stages of Development on Forage Yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Genotypes

Magdy Maher Mosad, Salah Ahmed Okasha Mohamed Abdullah El-Ashry
{"title":"Effect of Water Deficit at different Stages of Development on Forage Yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Genotypes","authors":"Magdy Maher Mosad, Salah Ahmed Okasha Mohamed Abdullah El-Ashry","doi":"10.21608/jpps.2021.178523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was evaluated fourteen populations of cowpea at Farm of Agriculture Research Station Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt. These populations were collected from different regions including one check variety. These were investigated under three levels of watering (100%, 75% and 50% of field capacity), for forage yield, genetic variability and association characters during two successive summer seasons 2017 and 2018 using a Randomized Complete Block Design in a split plot. Analysis of variance was revealed significant variation (P < 0.05) among cowpea genotypes for plant length, number of shoots/plant, dry matter percent, forage fresh and dry yields/plot, expected forage fresh and dry yields/fad and water use efficiency. The irrigation levels had non-significant effects on remain traits {i.e.: plant length, number of shoots/plant in the second season, leaf/stem ratio, dry matter percent, forage fresh and dry yields/plot, expected forage dry yield/fad and water use efficiency}. Moreover, the irrigation levels and cowpea genotypes-interaction had highly significant differences for the studied traits, excepting of number of shoots/plant. Among the fourteen cowpea genotypes through the three irrigation levels, over two seasons (2017 & 2018); the Kenyan genotype named KF-122 was produced significant more crude protein (24.20%) and crude fiber (27.60%), whilst, this genotype; IN-1-14 was produced significant less crude protein (12.20%) and crude fiber (13.90%), furthermore the, the cheek Egyptian genotype named \"Buff\" was recorded, approximately, average aforementioned value over two seasons. The phenotypic variance (d2p) and phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV %) were slightly higher than corresponding genotypic variance (d2g) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV %) for the quantitative forage characters of cowpea indicated the presence of less environmental effect (d2e and ECV %) upon the concerned characters. Heritability in broad sense estimates was moderate to high for all studied traits","PeriodicalId":333932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Production Sciences","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Production Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/jpps.2021.178523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was evaluated fourteen populations of cowpea at Farm of Agriculture Research Station Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt. These populations were collected from different regions including one check variety. These were investigated under three levels of watering (100%, 75% and 50% of field capacity), for forage yield, genetic variability and association characters during two successive summer seasons 2017 and 2018 using a Randomized Complete Block Design in a split plot. Analysis of variance was revealed significant variation (P < 0.05) among cowpea genotypes for plant length, number of shoots/plant, dry matter percent, forage fresh and dry yields/plot, expected forage fresh and dry yields/fad and water use efficiency. The irrigation levels had non-significant effects on remain traits {i.e.: plant length, number of shoots/plant in the second season, leaf/stem ratio, dry matter percent, forage fresh and dry yields/plot, expected forage dry yield/fad and water use efficiency}. Moreover, the irrigation levels and cowpea genotypes-interaction had highly significant differences for the studied traits, excepting of number of shoots/plant. Among the fourteen cowpea genotypes through the three irrigation levels, over two seasons (2017 & 2018); the Kenyan genotype named KF-122 was produced significant more crude protein (24.20%) and crude fiber (27.60%), whilst, this genotype; IN-1-14 was produced significant less crude protein (12.20%) and crude fiber (13.90%), furthermore the, the cheek Egyptian genotype named "Buff" was recorded, approximately, average aforementioned value over two seasons. The phenotypic variance (d2p) and phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV %) were slightly higher than corresponding genotypic variance (d2g) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV %) for the quantitative forage characters of cowpea indicated the presence of less environmental effect (d2e and ECV %) upon the concerned characters. Heritability in broad sense estimates was moderate to high for all studied traits
不同发育阶段水分亏缺对豇豆饲用产量的影响基因型
本研究对埃及伊斯梅利亚省伊斯梅利亚农业研究站的14个豇豆种群进行了评价。这些种群来自不同的地区,包括一个检查品种。采用随机完全区设计,对2017年和2018年连续两个夏季的牧草产量、遗传变异和关联性状进行了三种水平(田间水量的100%、75%和50%)的研究。方差分析表明,不同豇豆基因型在株长、芽数/株、干物质率、草料鲜干产量/田、草料预期鲜干产量/田和水分利用效率上差异显著(P < 0.05)。灌溉水平对剩余性状无显著影响。:株长、第二季芽数/株、叶茎比、干物质百分比、牧草鲜干产量/畦、牧草预期干产量/畦、水分利用效率}。此外,灌溉水平和豇豆基因型互作对所研究性状有极显著的差异,除芽/株数外。在14个豇豆基因型中,通过三个灌溉水平,在两个季节(2017年和2018年);肯尼亚基因型KF-122产生的粗蛋白质(24.20%)和粗纤维(27.60%)显著高于肯尼亚基因型KF-122;IN-1-14的粗蛋白质产量(12.20%)和粗纤维产量(13.90%)显著低于其他品种,而“Buff”基因型的粗纤维产量约为两个季节的平均值。豇豆数量饲料性状的表型方差(d2p)和表型变异系数(PCV %)略高于相应的基因型方差(d2g)和基因型变异系数(GCV %),表明环境对相关性状的影响(d2e和ECV %)较小。所有研究性状的广义遗传力均为中高遗传力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信