Contesting Europe: Comparative Perspectives on Early Modern Discourses on Europe, 1400–1800 — an Introduction

N. Detering, Clementina Marsico, Isabella Walser‐Bürgler
{"title":"Contesting Europe: Comparative Perspectives on Early Modern Discourses on Europe, 1400–1800 — an Introduction","authors":"N. Detering, Clementina Marsico, Isabella Walser‐Bürgler","doi":"10.1163/9789004414716_002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"sometimes represented as a dangerous Othello-like seducer, with evil designs on wholesome English water. Shahani buttresses her insightful and largely convincing readings of early modern literature with a satisfying array of theoretical supports, from Kyla Wazana Tompkins’s notion of racial indigestion to Arjun Appadurai’s work on globalization. As a result, she is able to tease out new significance from Oberon’s tussles with Titania over the Indian Boy, Prospero’s vanishing banquet, and Oroonoko’s dreadful death. A growing body of research demonstrates that metaphors based on eating were pervasive in this period; in its focus on the culinary language associated with racial or cultural Others, Tasting Difference makes a valuable contribution to this scholarship. Nonetheless, at times its reach exceeds its grasp. Shahani for instance makes the bold assertion that it is in cookbooks, dietary manuals, and literary works that “a conception of racial, cultural and religious difference” is articulated. Surely this is just one place where such conceptions were articulated. The period’s religious writings, to pick just one contrasting example, are (unsurprisingly) also rich in articulations of racial, cultural, and religious difference. It’s a pity that Shahani occasionally felt it necessary to push her argument and material beyond what they are able to sustain, since Tasting Difference succeeds very well in illuminating food’s powerful ability to articulate racial difference in the imaginative works of this period. Her readings of Shakespeare, and works by other familiar and less familiar early modern writers, convincingly reveal how certain foods and the peoples with whom these became associated were “imagined in the literature of the early modern period” (6). Tasting Difference will be read with profit by the now-substantial community of food scholars, and by all those interested in the ways in which “outside histories” in fact form an essential part of any history of the British Isles.","PeriodicalId":402734,"journal":{"name":"Contesting Europe ","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contesting Europe ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004414716_002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

sometimes represented as a dangerous Othello-like seducer, with evil designs on wholesome English water. Shahani buttresses her insightful and largely convincing readings of early modern literature with a satisfying array of theoretical supports, from Kyla Wazana Tompkins’s notion of racial indigestion to Arjun Appadurai’s work on globalization. As a result, she is able to tease out new significance from Oberon’s tussles with Titania over the Indian Boy, Prospero’s vanishing banquet, and Oroonoko’s dreadful death. A growing body of research demonstrates that metaphors based on eating were pervasive in this period; in its focus on the culinary language associated with racial or cultural Others, Tasting Difference makes a valuable contribution to this scholarship. Nonetheless, at times its reach exceeds its grasp. Shahani for instance makes the bold assertion that it is in cookbooks, dietary manuals, and literary works that “a conception of racial, cultural and religious difference” is articulated. Surely this is just one place where such conceptions were articulated. The period’s religious writings, to pick just one contrasting example, are (unsurprisingly) also rich in articulations of racial, cultural, and religious difference. It’s a pity that Shahani occasionally felt it necessary to push her argument and material beyond what they are able to sustain, since Tasting Difference succeeds very well in illuminating food’s powerful ability to articulate racial difference in the imaginative works of this period. Her readings of Shakespeare, and works by other familiar and less familiar early modern writers, convincingly reveal how certain foods and the peoples with whom these became associated were “imagined in the literature of the early modern period” (6). Tasting Difference will be read with profit by the now-substantial community of food scholars, and by all those interested in the ways in which “outside histories” in fact form an essential part of any history of the British Isles.
欧洲之争:近代早期欧洲论述的比较视角,1400-1800 -导论
有时被描绘成一个危险的奥赛罗式的诱惑者,对健康的英国水怀有邪恶的企图。从Kyla Wazana Tompkins关于种族消化不良的观点到Arjun apadurai关于全球化的著作,Shahani对早期现代文学的阅读具有深刻的见解,并且在很大程度上令人信服,她还提供了一系列令人满意的理论支持。因此,她能够从奥伯龙和泰坦尼亚为印第安男孩的争执、普洛斯彼罗消失的宴会和奥鲁诺科可怕的死亡中梳理出新的意义。越来越多的研究表明,在这一时期,与饮食有关的隐喻很普遍;《品尝差异》专注于与种族或文化他人相关的烹饪语言,为这项奖学金做出了宝贵的贡献。尽管如此,有时它的影响力超出了它的掌控范围。例如,沙哈尼大胆地断言,在烹饪书、饮食手册和文学作品中,“种族、文化和宗教差异的概念”是明确的。当然,这只是表达这种概念的一个地方。仅举一个对比鲜明的例子,这一时期的宗教著作(毫不奇怪)也丰富了种族、文化和宗教差异的表达。遗憾的是,沙哈尼偶尔觉得有必要把她的论点和材料推到超出它们所能承受的范围之外,因为《品尝差异》非常成功地阐明了食物在这一时期富有想象力的作品中表达种族差异的强大能力。她阅读了莎士比亚以及其他熟悉的或不太熟悉的早期现代作家的作品,令人信服地揭示了某些食物以及与这些食物有关的民族是如何“在早期现代文学中被想象出来的”(6)。《品尝差异》将为现在庞大的食品学者群体以及所有对“外部历史”实际上构成不列颠群岛任何历史的重要组成部分感兴趣的人带来好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信