Student Engagement in an Online Software Engineering Course

Bruce Maxim, Thomas Limbaugh, Jeffrey J. Yackley
{"title":"Student Engagement in an Online Software Engineering Course","authors":"Bruce Maxim, Thomas Limbaugh, Jeffrey J. Yackley","doi":"10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Engineering instructors often rely on lectures as their primary mode of instruction even in project courses. In the lecture mode of instruction student engagement with the course material is often low or non-existent. Many engineering educators regard experiential learning as the best way to train the next generation of software engineers. For the past five years, one of the authors has taught a junior level software engineering course using active learning methods in a flipped classroom setting. During this past year, the COVID-19 lockdown prevented in-person delivery of this course. The challenge facing engineering faculty everywhere is figuring out how to include active learning experiences in online course delivery. This paper describes the authors' experiences introducing active learning methodologies into a junior level online software engineering course. The project team carefully considered the active learning course materials used in the in-person delivery of this course and adapted them to accommodate the idiosyncrasies of an online course delivery environment. Most importantly, a comparable online course delivery alternative needed to include zoom video class sessions containing live active learning exercises. The investigators compared the levels of student engagement between previous in-person offerings of the course with the online adaptation of the same course. Student engagement data was collected from each style of course delivery. In some cases, this data was supplemented by observational data and with Canvas course analytics. We found that students in both course settings were least engaged when listening to short lectures (either live or video recordings) and felt most engaged when involved in small group activities (either in person or in Zoom sessions with breakout rooms).","PeriodicalId":408497,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Engineering instructors often rely on lectures as their primary mode of instruction even in project courses. In the lecture mode of instruction student engagement with the course material is often low or non-existent. Many engineering educators regard experiential learning as the best way to train the next generation of software engineers. For the past five years, one of the authors has taught a junior level software engineering course using active learning methods in a flipped classroom setting. During this past year, the COVID-19 lockdown prevented in-person delivery of this course. The challenge facing engineering faculty everywhere is figuring out how to include active learning experiences in online course delivery. This paper describes the authors' experiences introducing active learning methodologies into a junior level online software engineering course. The project team carefully considered the active learning course materials used in the in-person delivery of this course and adapted them to accommodate the idiosyncrasies of an online course delivery environment. Most importantly, a comparable online course delivery alternative needed to include zoom video class sessions containing live active learning exercises. The investigators compared the levels of student engagement between previous in-person offerings of the course with the online adaptation of the same course. Student engagement data was collected from each style of course delivery. In some cases, this data was supplemented by observational data and with Canvas course analytics. We found that students in both course settings were least engaged when listening to short lectures (either live or video recordings) and felt most engaged when involved in small group activities (either in person or in Zoom sessions with breakout rooms).
在线软件工程课程的学生参与度
工程讲师往往依靠讲座作为他们的主要教学模式,即使在项目课程。在课堂教学模式下,学生对课程材料的参与度往往很低或根本不参与。许多工程教育家认为体验式学习是培养下一代软件工程师的最佳方式。在过去的五年中,其中一位作者在翻转课堂设置中使用主动学习方法教授初级软件工程课程。在过去的一年里,由于COVID-19的封锁,该课程无法亲自授课。世界各地的工程学院面临的挑战是如何将主动学习经验纳入在线课程交付。本文描述了作者在初级软件工程在线课程中引入主动学习方法的经验。项目团队仔细考虑了本课程现场授课中使用的主动学习课程材料,并对其进行了调整,以适应在线课程授课环境的特点。最重要的是,一个可比的在线课程交付替代方案需要包括包含实时主动学习练习的缩放视频课程。研究人员比较了学生对之前的面对面课程和在线课程的参与程度。从每一种授课方式中收集了学生参与度数据。在某些情况下,这些数据由观察数据和Canvas课程分析补充。我们发现,在这两种课程设置中,学生在听简短的讲座(无论是现场还是视频录音)时参与度最低,而在参与小组活动(无论是面对面的还是在Zoom会议上的分组讨论室)时,他们的参与度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信