Wireless Interference Analysis for Home IoT Security Vulnerability Detection

Alexander McDaid, Eoghan Furey, K. Curran
{"title":"Wireless Interference Analysis for Home IoT Security Vulnerability Detection","authors":"Alexander McDaid, Eoghan Furey, K. Curran","doi":"10.4018/ijwnbt.2021070104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integrity of wireless networks that make up the clear majority of IoT networks lack the inherent security of their wired counterparts. With the growth of the internet of things (IoT) and its pervasive nature in the modern home environment, it has caused a spike in security concerns over how the network infrastructure handles, transmits, and stores data. New wireless attacks such as KeySniffer and other attacks of this type cannot be tracked by traditional solutions. Therefore, this study investigates if wireless spectrum frequency monitoring using interference analysis tools can aid in the monitoring of device signals within a home IoT network. This could be used enhance the security compliance guidelines set forth by OWASP and NIST for these network types and the devices associated. Active and passive network scanning tools are used to provide analysis of device vulnerability and as comparison for device discovery purposes. The work shows the advantages and disadvantages of this signal pattern testing technique compared to traditional network scanning methods. The authors demonstrate how RF spectrum analysis is an effective way of monitoring network traffic over the air waves but also possesses limitations in that knowledge is needed to decipher these patterns. This article demonstrates alternative methods of interference analysis detection.","PeriodicalId":422249,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Wirel. Networks Broadband Technol.","volume":"75 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Wirel. Networks Broadband Technol.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwnbt.2021070104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The integrity of wireless networks that make up the clear majority of IoT networks lack the inherent security of their wired counterparts. With the growth of the internet of things (IoT) and its pervasive nature in the modern home environment, it has caused a spike in security concerns over how the network infrastructure handles, transmits, and stores data. New wireless attacks such as KeySniffer and other attacks of this type cannot be tracked by traditional solutions. Therefore, this study investigates if wireless spectrum frequency monitoring using interference analysis tools can aid in the monitoring of device signals within a home IoT network. This could be used enhance the security compliance guidelines set forth by OWASP and NIST for these network types and the devices associated. Active and passive network scanning tools are used to provide analysis of device vulnerability and as comparison for device discovery purposes. The work shows the advantages and disadvantages of this signal pattern testing technique compared to traditional network scanning methods. The authors demonstrate how RF spectrum analysis is an effective way of monitoring network traffic over the air waves but also possesses limitations in that knowledge is needed to decipher these patterns. This article demonstrates alternative methods of interference analysis detection.
基于无线干扰分析的家庭物联网安全漏洞检测
无线网络的完整性构成了绝大多数物联网网络,缺乏有线网络的固有安全性。随着物联网(IoT)的发展及其在现代家庭环境中的普及,它引发了对网络基础设施如何处理、传输和存储数据的安全担忧。新的无线攻击,如KeySniffer和其他这种类型的攻击无法被传统的解决方案跟踪。因此,本研究调查了使用干扰分析工具的无线频谱频率监测是否有助于监测家庭物联网网络中的设备信号。这可以用来增强OWASP和NIST为这些网络类型和相关设备制定的安全遵从性指南。主动和被动网络扫描工具用于分析设备漏洞,并作为设备发现的比较。研究表明,与传统的网络扫描方法相比,这种信号模式测试技术的优点和缺点。作者演示了射频频谱分析是一种有效的监测无线电波网络流量的方法,但也有局限性,因为破译这些模式需要知识。本文演示了干扰分析检测的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信