Validation of the Korean Version of the Humiliation Inventory

Sera Lee, Shin, Hyunkyun
{"title":"Validation of the Korean Version of the Humiliation Inventory","authors":"Sera Lee, Shin, Hyunkyun","doi":"10.15842/KJCP.2018.37.1.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Humiliation Inventory (HI) was developed by Hartling and Luchetta(1999) to assess the internal experience of humiliation. The aim of this study is to validate the Korean version of HI (K-HI). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the data of 252 adults (Mean age= 34.83, SD= 7.6) to check factorial validation. After 10 items that cross-loaded onto two factors were removed, three factors of 22 items were confirmed. Based on the EFA, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the data of 253 adults (Mean age= 34.12, SD= 8.5) to test the stability and generalization of the factor structure. The original Inventory had two subscales: “fear of humiliation” (F1), and “cumulative humiliation” (F2). When a third factor, “humiliation of incompetence” (F3), was added to K-HI, the model fit (TLI= .90, CFI= .91, RMSEA= .09) was better than that of the two-factor model. This result may reflect cultural distinctiveness. Korea is a highly competitive society,-; therefore, “fear of humiliation” and “humiliation of incompetence” may have different meanings among the Korean people. Also, K-HI exhibited appropriate concurrent validity. It correlated with Internalized Shame positively and with Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem negatively. Assuming that humiliation correlates with anger and aggression, correlation analyses were carried out with the State-Trait Anger Expression. They showed significantly positive correlations and demonstrated the clinical utility of K-HI. Cronbach’s αs of the three factors were good (F1= .96, F2= .94, F3= .81). K-HI is expected to be used in the studies of other themes, such as anger, aggression, depression, suicide, and psychotherapy.”","PeriodicalId":115450,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15842/KJCP.2018.37.1.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Humiliation Inventory (HI) was developed by Hartling and Luchetta(1999) to assess the internal experience of humiliation. The aim of this study is to validate the Korean version of HI (K-HI). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on the data of 252 adults (Mean age= 34.83, SD= 7.6) to check factorial validation. After 10 items that cross-loaded onto two factors were removed, three factors of 22 items were confirmed. Based on the EFA, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted on the data of 253 adults (Mean age= 34.12, SD= 8.5) to test the stability and generalization of the factor structure. The original Inventory had two subscales: “fear of humiliation” (F1), and “cumulative humiliation” (F2). When a third factor, “humiliation of incompetence” (F3), was added to K-HI, the model fit (TLI= .90, CFI= .91, RMSEA= .09) was better than that of the two-factor model. This result may reflect cultural distinctiveness. Korea is a highly competitive society,-; therefore, “fear of humiliation” and “humiliation of incompetence” may have different meanings among the Korean people. Also, K-HI exhibited appropriate concurrent validity. It correlated with Internalized Shame positively and with Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem negatively. Assuming that humiliation correlates with anger and aggression, correlation analyses were carried out with the State-Trait Anger Expression. They showed significantly positive correlations and demonstrated the clinical utility of K-HI. Cronbach’s αs of the three factors were good (F1= .96, F2= .94, F3= .81). K-HI is expected to be used in the studies of other themes, such as anger, aggression, depression, suicide, and psychotherapy.”
韩国版《屈辱清单》的验证
羞辱量表(HI)是由Hartling和Luchetta(1999)开发的,用于评估羞辱的内部体验。本研究的目的是验证韩国版HI (K-HI)。对252例成人(平均年龄34.83岁,SD= 7.6)的资料进行探索性因子分析(EFA)检验析因验证。将交叉加载到两个因素上的10个项目剔除后,确定了22个项目中的3个因素。基于EFA,对253名成人(平均年龄34.12岁,SD= 8.5)的数据进行验证性因子分析(CFA),检验因子结构的稳定性和通用性。原始量表有两个子量表:“羞辱恐惧”(F1)和“累积羞辱”(F2)。当K-HI中加入第三个因子“无能羞辱”(F3)时,模型拟合(TLI= 0.90, CFI= 0.91, RMSEA= 0.09)优于双因子模型。这一结果可能反映了文化的独特性。韩国是一个竞争激烈的社会,-;因此,“怕屈辱”和“怕无能”在韩国人中可能有不同的含义。同时,K-HI表现出适当的并发效度。它与内化羞耻感呈正相关,与Rosenberg自尊呈负相关。假设屈辱与愤怒和攻击相关,用状态-特质愤怒表达进行相关分析。两者呈显著正相关,证明了K-HI的临床应用价值。3个因素的Cronbach αs均较好(F1= 0.96, F2= 0.94, F3= 0.81)。K-HI有望用于其他主题的研究,如愤怒、侵略、抑郁、自杀和心理治疗。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信