A Discourse Analysis of Grammatical Cohesion in News Item Text of "Symphony 3" XII Grade English Textbook

N. Nurwahidah, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, N. Husna, A. Alek
{"title":"A Discourse Analysis of Grammatical Cohesion in News Item Text of \"Symphony 3\" XII Grade English Textbook","authors":"N. Nurwahidah, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, N. Husna, A. Alek","doi":"10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to (1) determine the kind of grammatical cohesion devices that were used in a news item text of a textbook (2) to examine how reference, substitution, ellipses, and conjunction were used to describe the Cohesion that was used in the news item text of an English textbook for senior high school students in the 12th grade \"Symphony 3\". This study is qualitative descriptive research. The analysis of data found that the grammatical cohesion devices in the news item text of the textbook are reference, conjunction, and ellipsis. References become the most common devices, followed by conjunction and ellipsis. Surprisingly, there is no substitution found in this text. Hence, substitution and ellipsis are the two most minor common forms of cohesive devices. It demonstrates that the two types of coherent devices have no use in written discourse. The news item text of the textbook is written cohesively \"good\" as the percentage is 61 % for the reference. In comparison, 38% for the conjunction is categorized as \"fair.\" This textbook is considered an objective criterion of cohesiveness. It may be fascinating to analyze these in separate studies in spoken discourse, particularly spontaneous speech.","PeriodicalId":223469,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study aims to (1) determine the kind of grammatical cohesion devices that were used in a news item text of a textbook (2) to examine how reference, substitution, ellipses, and conjunction were used to describe the Cohesion that was used in the news item text of an English textbook for senior high school students in the 12th grade "Symphony 3". This study is qualitative descriptive research. The analysis of data found that the grammatical cohesion devices in the news item text of the textbook are reference, conjunction, and ellipsis. References become the most common devices, followed by conjunction and ellipsis. Surprisingly, there is no substitution found in this text. Hence, substitution and ellipsis are the two most minor common forms of cohesive devices. It demonstrates that the two types of coherent devices have no use in written discourse. The news item text of the textbook is written cohesively "good" as the percentage is 61 % for the reference. In comparison, 38% for the conjunction is categorized as "fair." This textbook is considered an objective criterion of cohesiveness. It may be fascinating to analyze these in separate studies in spoken discourse, particularly spontaneous speech.
《交响曲3》十二年级英语教材新闻篇章语法衔接的语篇分析
本研究的目的是:(1)确定教材新闻篇章中所使用的语法衔接手段的类型(2)考察参考、替代、省略号和连词是如何描述高三英语教材《交响乐3》新闻篇章中所使用的衔接手段的。本研究为定性描述性研究。数据分析发现,教材新闻篇章的语法衔接手段主要有指称、连词和省略。指称成为最常用的手段,其次是连词和省略号。令人惊讶的是,在这篇文章中没有发现替代。因此,替代和省略是两种最次要的常用衔接手段。结果表明,这两种类型的连贯语篇在书面语篇中毫无用处。教材的新闻条目文本写得衔接“好”,参考率为61%。相比之下,38%的连接被归类为“公平”。这本教材被认为是衡量凝聚力的客观标准。在单独的口语研究中分析这些可能会很有趣,尤其是在自发的演讲中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信