AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE DI KELAS XI MIPA SMA N 5 BUKITTINGGI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2019/2020

Novetri Rahmah, M. Imamuddin, Tasnim Rahmat
{"title":"AKTIVITAS BELAJAR DAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIKA SISWA MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK TALK WRITE DI KELAS XI MIPA SMA N 5 BUKITTINGGI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2019/2020","authors":"Novetri Rahmah, M. Imamuddin, Tasnim Rahmat","doi":"10.15548/MEJ.V4I1.1148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is motivated by the lack of student activity in the learning process and the low ability to understand students' mathematical concepts. This is contrary to learning that is still conventional in nature, namely the learning process issued by the teacher. To overcome this problem, the Think Talk Write (TTW) cooperative learning model is applied. Mathematics learning for students who learn to think to talk cooperative learning models (TTW) and understanding mathematical concepts who learn think to talk cooperative learning models (TTW) are better for those looking for conventional learning. This type of research is a pre-trial research design that is the Static Group Comparison Design. The population in this study were all class XI MIPA. The sample in this study was class XI MIPA 2 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA 1 as a control class. The instrument used in the study was an observation sheet and a concept understanding test consisting of essay tests. Data obtained from the results of the study concluded that student activity with the cooperative learning model think talk writes (TTW) was 69.75%, so the activity was classified as active. Based on data analysis using t-test, it can be denied that \"The ability to understand the mathematics of students who use the cooperative learning model of the type of think talk write (TTW) is better than conventional learning in class XI MIPA SMA N 5 Bukittinggi 2019/2020 academic year\".","PeriodicalId":231880,"journal":{"name":"Math Educa Journal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Math Educa Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/MEJ.V4I1.1148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research is motivated by the lack of student activity in the learning process and the low ability to understand students' mathematical concepts. This is contrary to learning that is still conventional in nature, namely the learning process issued by the teacher. To overcome this problem, the Think Talk Write (TTW) cooperative learning model is applied. Mathematics learning for students who learn to think to talk cooperative learning models (TTW) and understanding mathematical concepts who learn think to talk cooperative learning models (TTW) are better for those looking for conventional learning. This type of research is a pre-trial research design that is the Static Group Comparison Design. The population in this study were all class XI MIPA. The sample in this study was class XI MIPA 2 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA 1 as a control class. The instrument used in the study was an observation sheet and a concept understanding test consisting of essay tests. Data obtained from the results of the study concluded that student activity with the cooperative learning model think talk writes (TTW) was 69.75%, so the activity was classified as active. Based on data analysis using t-test, it can be denied that "The ability to understand the mathematics of students who use the cooperative learning model of the type of think talk write (TTW) is better than conventional learning in class XI MIPA SMA N 5 Bukittinggi 2019/2020 academic year".
本研究的动机是学生在学习过程中缺乏主动性,对学生数学概念的理解能力较低。这与本质上仍然是传统的学习,即教师发布的学习过程是相反的。为了克服这一问题,本文采用了“思说写”(TTW)合作学习模式。学习思维说话的学生学习数学的合作学习模式(TTW)和理解数学概念的学习思维说话的合作学习模式(TTW)更适合那些寻求传统学习的学生。这种类型的研究是一种试验前研究设计,即静态组比较设计。在研究中使用的工具是一张观察表和一个概念理解测试,包括作文测试。从研究结果中获得的数据表明,采用合作学习模式的学生活动(TTW)占69.75%,因此该活动被归类为活跃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信