Position Article on Integrating Data and Model to Understand Disease Interactions

M. Nabi, A. Arvay, M. Klenk, Gaurang Gavai, D. Bobrow, J. Kleer
{"title":"Position Article on Integrating Data and Model to Understand Disease Interactions","authors":"M. Nabi, A. Arvay, M. Klenk, Gaurang Gavai, D. Bobrow, J. Kleer","doi":"10.1109/ICHI.2017.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comorbidities - cases in which patients have two or more chronic conditions - impose burden on the health care system as well as society. Causal relationships and interaction among different diseases in the comorbidity set is complex, and not yet completely understood by the medical community. Understanding the causality between diseases is an essential element of science of medicine. Patient treatment would also be more efficient if better knowledge of causality was available. There are different approaches to shed more lights on causality in medicine. In this article, we propose two approaches. One is using statistical causal inference algorithms on electronic medical data to identify potential causal relationships among diseases. In the second approach, we use qualitative modeling techniques to build models of disease mechanisms. Each one of these directions has its own pitfalls. The assumption is integrating the two approaches will minimize the drawbacks of each. The integration involves using qualitative models of underlying disease mechanisms to evaluate and explain the potential causal relationships resulted from the causal inference algorithms. This integration is complex, and require big effort from the community. In this article, we are proposing new research direction based on our preliminary work.","PeriodicalId":263611,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2017.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comorbidities - cases in which patients have two or more chronic conditions - impose burden on the health care system as well as society. Causal relationships and interaction among different diseases in the comorbidity set is complex, and not yet completely understood by the medical community. Understanding the causality between diseases is an essential element of science of medicine. Patient treatment would also be more efficient if better knowledge of causality was available. There are different approaches to shed more lights on causality in medicine. In this article, we propose two approaches. One is using statistical causal inference algorithms on electronic medical data to identify potential causal relationships among diseases. In the second approach, we use qualitative modeling techniques to build models of disease mechanisms. Each one of these directions has its own pitfalls. The assumption is integrating the two approaches will minimize the drawbacks of each. The integration involves using qualitative models of underlying disease mechanisms to evaluate and explain the potential causal relationships resulted from the causal inference algorithms. This integration is complex, and require big effort from the community. In this article, we are proposing new research direction based on our preliminary work.
整合数据和模型来理解疾病的相互作用
合并症——患者同时患有两种或两种以上慢性病的病例——给卫生保健系统和社会带来了负担。在共病组中,不同疾病之间的因果关系和相互作用是复杂的,医学界尚未完全理解。了解疾病之间的因果关系是医学科学的一个基本要素。如果对因果关系有更好的了解,对病人的治疗也会更有效。有不同的方法来阐明医学中的因果关系。在本文中,我们提出了两种方法。一种是在电子医疗数据上使用统计因果推理算法来识别疾病之间潜在的因果关系。在第二种方法中,我们使用定性建模技术来建立疾病机制的模型。每一个方向都有其自身的缺陷。假设将这两种方法集成将使每种方法的缺点最小化。整合包括使用潜在疾病机制的定性模型来评估和解释因果推理算法产生的潜在因果关系。这种集成是复杂的,需要社区付出巨大的努力。本文在前期工作的基础上,提出了新的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信