The role of no radio (NORDO) events in airspace security

P. Ostwald
{"title":"The role of no radio (NORDO) events in airspace security","authors":"P. Ostwald","doi":"10.1109/ICNSURV.2008.4559170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The FAA and the other air domain security partners are employing multilayered security techniques to attempt to deter and prevent attacks such as a hijack from happening in the future. However, there exists the possibility that the security measures employed can be circumvented or defeated, and that terrorists can take unauthorized control of an aircraft while in flight. If such a situation occurs, it is critical to detect the situation and to do so as soon as possible. Time is critical in these situations - the earlier the attack is detected, the more time is available to mitigate the situation. Sometimes there is an event that might be an indicator that an attack is underway. One such event is the loss of two-way radio communication with a flight under air traffic control. Monitoring for such events helps gain critical time needed for response if a hijack is occurring. However, loss of radio communication is a relatively common event - several occur each day in the National Airspace System. The vast majority of these events are not an indication of a possible hijack - they occur for other reasons. So the challenge becomes: how to differentiate between the vast majority of loss of communication events due to reasons other than an attempt to take unauthorized control of an aircraft while in flight from those that are (this is a classic \"needle in the haystack\" problem). This paper discusses a preliminary analysis of loss of radio communication events. MITRE's Center for Advanced Aviation System Analysis (CAASD) conducted this analysis to gain insight into these events which might lead to improvements in their use as an indicator of a potential security incident such as a hijack.","PeriodicalId":201010,"journal":{"name":"2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Integrated Communications, Navigation and Surveillance Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2008.4559170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The FAA and the other air domain security partners are employing multilayered security techniques to attempt to deter and prevent attacks such as a hijack from happening in the future. However, there exists the possibility that the security measures employed can be circumvented or defeated, and that terrorists can take unauthorized control of an aircraft while in flight. If such a situation occurs, it is critical to detect the situation and to do so as soon as possible. Time is critical in these situations - the earlier the attack is detected, the more time is available to mitigate the situation. Sometimes there is an event that might be an indicator that an attack is underway. One such event is the loss of two-way radio communication with a flight under air traffic control. Monitoring for such events helps gain critical time needed for response if a hijack is occurring. However, loss of radio communication is a relatively common event - several occur each day in the National Airspace System. The vast majority of these events are not an indication of a possible hijack - they occur for other reasons. So the challenge becomes: how to differentiate between the vast majority of loss of communication events due to reasons other than an attempt to take unauthorized control of an aircraft while in flight from those that are (this is a classic "needle in the haystack" problem). This paper discusses a preliminary analysis of loss of radio communication events. MITRE's Center for Advanced Aviation System Analysis (CAASD) conducted this analysis to gain insight into these events which might lead to improvements in their use as an indicator of a potential security incident such as a hijack.
无无线电(NORDO)事件在空域安全中的作用
美国联邦航空局和其他空域安全合作伙伴正在采用多层安全技术,试图阻止和防止未来发生劫机等攻击。然而,所采取的安全措施有可能被绕过或破坏,恐怖分子可以在飞行中未经授权控制飞机。如果发生这种情况,关键是要发现这种情况,并尽快采取行动。在这些情况下,时间是至关重要的——越早发现攻击,就有越多的时间来缓解这种情况。有时,有一个事件可能是攻击正在进行的迹象。其中一个事件是与空中交通管制下的航班失去双向无线电通信。监视此类事件有助于在发生劫持事件时获得响应所需的关键时间。然而,无线电通信丢失是一个相对常见的事件——在国家空域系统中每天都会发生几起。这些事件中的绝大多数并不意味着可能发生劫机——它们是由于其他原因发生的。因此,挑战就变成了:如何区分绝大多数通信丢失事件是由于飞行中未经授权控制飞机以外的原因造成的(这是一个经典的“大海捞针”问题)。本文对无线电通信损失事件进行了初步分析。MITRE的高级航空系统分析中心(CAASD)进行了这项分析,以深入了解这些事件,从而改进它们作为潜在安全事件(如劫持)指标的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信