Getting users to pay attention to anti-phishing education: evaluation of retention and transfer

P. Kumaraguru, Yong Rhee, Steve Sheng, Sharique Hasan, A. Acquisti, L. Cranor, Jason I. Hong
{"title":"Getting users to pay attention to anti-phishing education: evaluation of retention and transfer","authors":"P. Kumaraguru, Yong Rhee, Steve Sheng, Sharique Hasan, A. Acquisti, L. Cranor, Jason I. Hong","doi":"10.1145/1299015.1299022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational materials designed to teach users not to fall for phishing attacks are widely available but are often ignored by users. In this paper, we extend an embedded training methodology using learning science principles in which phishing education is made part of a primary task for users. The goal is to motivate users to pay attention to the training materials. In embedded training, users are sent simulated phishing attacks and trained after they fall for the attacks. Prior studies tested users immediately after training and demonstrated that embedded training improved users' ability to identify phishing emails and websites. In the present study, we tested users to determine how well they retained knowledge gained through embedded training and how well they transferred this knowledge to identify other types of phishing emails. We also compared the effectiveness of the same training materials delivered via embedded training and delivered as regular email messages. In our experiments, we found that: (a) users learn more effectively when the training materials are presented after users fall for the attack (embedded) than when the same training materials are sent by email (non-embedded); (b) users retain and transfer more knowledge after embedded training than after non-embedded training; and (c) users with higher Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) scores are more likely than users with lower CRT scores to click on the links in the phishing emails from companies with which they have no account.","PeriodicalId":130252,"journal":{"name":"APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"168","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APWG Symposium on Electronic Crime Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1299015.1299022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 168

Abstract

Educational materials designed to teach users not to fall for phishing attacks are widely available but are often ignored by users. In this paper, we extend an embedded training methodology using learning science principles in which phishing education is made part of a primary task for users. The goal is to motivate users to pay attention to the training materials. In embedded training, users are sent simulated phishing attacks and trained after they fall for the attacks. Prior studies tested users immediately after training and demonstrated that embedded training improved users' ability to identify phishing emails and websites. In the present study, we tested users to determine how well they retained knowledge gained through embedded training and how well they transferred this knowledge to identify other types of phishing emails. We also compared the effectiveness of the same training materials delivered via embedded training and delivered as regular email messages. In our experiments, we found that: (a) users learn more effectively when the training materials are presented after users fall for the attack (embedded) than when the same training materials are sent by email (non-embedded); (b) users retain and transfer more knowledge after embedded training than after non-embedded training; and (c) users with higher Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) scores are more likely than users with lower CRT scores to click on the links in the phishing emails from companies with which they have no account.
让用户重视反钓鱼教育:留存和转移评估
旨在教导用户不要落入网络钓鱼攻击的教育材料随处可见,但往往被用户忽视。在本文中,我们使用学习科学原理扩展了嵌入式培训方法,其中网络钓鱼教育成为用户的主要任务的一部分。目标是激励用户关注培训材料。在嵌入式培训中,向用户发送模拟的网络钓鱼攻击,并在用户遭受攻击后进行培训。之前的研究在培训后立即对用户进行测试,并证明嵌入式培训提高了用户识别网络钓鱼电子邮件和网站的能力。在本研究中,我们对用户进行了测试,以确定他们在多大程度上保留了通过嵌入式培训获得的知识,以及他们在多大程度上转移了这些知识来识别其他类型的网络钓鱼电子邮件。我们还比较了通过嵌入式培训和通过常规电子邮件传递的相同培训材料的有效性。在我们的实验中,我们发现:(a)与通过电子邮件发送相同的培训材料(非嵌入式)相比,在用户遭受攻击后呈现培训材料(嵌入式)的用户学习效率更高;(b)使用者在接受嵌入式培训后,会比接受非嵌入式培训后保留和转移更多的知识;(c)认知反射测试(CRT)得分较高的用户比得分较低的用户更有可能点击来自他们没有账户的公司的网络钓鱼邮件中的链接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信