Evaluation of National Fadama III Development Project

C. Amadi, H. D. Nyanwanyu, N. Amadi, Emeka Nkoro
{"title":"Evaluation of National Fadama III Development Project","authors":"C. Amadi, H. D. Nyanwanyu, N. Amadi, Emeka Nkoro","doi":"10.36096/BRSS.V1I1.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agriculture is the bedrock for combating poverty and developing rural areas. This motivated government policies on agriculture. This paper evaluated the performance of Fadama III in addressing food productivity and rural development in Rivers State. A critical review of secondary materials from Rivers State National Fadama III Development Programme Coordinating Office Report on implementation of National Fadama III projects in Rivers State formed the methodology for the study. It revealed the concept, approaches and implementation process of economic interest groups and government financial commitments to various farming activities in the local government areas. There were remarkable improvements in rural development in the participated local government areas. The assessment further revealed committed efforts by officers and management of the program which ensured effective implementation of rural infrastructure in participated communities. It is recommended that expenditure control measures adopted by the management of fadama program in Rivers State should be applied in future agricultural projects to ensure quality deliverables. The government should pursue only rural development-oriented agricultural policies, and finance projects that have certified Local Development Plans. Seemingly bottleneck criterion that would delay the release of funds should be relaxed for agricultural program managers to be proactive to beneficiaries’ requests and function effectively. Finally, the fadama program should be extended to increase communities’ dual opportunities of experiencing both agricultural and rural development.","PeriodicalId":290828,"journal":{"name":"Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285)","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bussecon Review of Social Sciences (2687-2285)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36096/BRSS.V1I1.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Agriculture is the bedrock for combating poverty and developing rural areas. This motivated government policies on agriculture. This paper evaluated the performance of Fadama III in addressing food productivity and rural development in Rivers State. A critical review of secondary materials from Rivers State National Fadama III Development Programme Coordinating Office Report on implementation of National Fadama III projects in Rivers State formed the methodology for the study. It revealed the concept, approaches and implementation process of economic interest groups and government financial commitments to various farming activities in the local government areas. There were remarkable improvements in rural development in the participated local government areas. The assessment further revealed committed efforts by officers and management of the program which ensured effective implementation of rural infrastructure in participated communities. It is recommended that expenditure control measures adopted by the management of fadama program in Rivers State should be applied in future agricultural projects to ensure quality deliverables. The government should pursue only rural development-oriented agricultural policies, and finance projects that have certified Local Development Plans. Seemingly bottleneck criterion that would delay the release of funds should be relaxed for agricultural program managers to be proactive to beneficiaries’ requests and function effectively. Finally, the fadama program should be extended to increase communities’ dual opportunities of experiencing both agricultural and rural development.
国家法达玛三期开发项目评价
农业是消除贫困、发展农村的基础。这推动了政府的农业政策。本文评估了Fadama III在解决河流州粮食生产力和农村发展问题方面的表现。对河流州国家法达玛三世发展方案协调办公室关于在河流州执行国家法达玛三世项目的报告中的二手材料进行了严格审查,形成了这项研究的方法。它揭示了经济利益集团和政府对地方政府管辖范围内各种农业活动的财政承诺的概念、方法和实施过程。在参与的地方政府辖区,农村发展有了显著改善。评估进一步揭示了官员和项目管理层的坚定努力,确保了参与社区农村基础设施的有效实施。建议在未来的农业项目中应用河流州法达玛项目管理层采用的支出控制措施,以确保交付的质量。政府应该只推行以农村发展为导向的农业政策,并为获得地方发展计划认证的项目提供资金。看似会延迟资金释放的瓶颈标准应该放宽,以便农业项目经理能够主动响应受益人的要求并有效地发挥作用。最后,应扩大fadama计划,以增加社区体验农业和农村发展的双重机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信