Reorganization of the memorial ceremony and changes in ceremonies before and after the division (1945~1953)

Y. Lee
{"title":"Reorganization of the memorial ceremony and changes in ceremonies before and after the division (1945~1953)","authors":"Y. Lee","doi":"10.29004/jkmch.2023.06.105.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The eight years before and after the division were the turbulent times of liberation, division, and war. This period required cultural planning to create members of a new era and group. During this period, the memorial was a major plan to secure the legitimacy of the group and form the identity of internal members through the meaning of death and the hierarchy of death. To this end, a memorial ceremony was held for the death of various ethnic groups from the past to the present immediately after liberation. The left and right sides each selected the object of the memorial ceremony and held a memorial ceremony to secure public support. However, as the political landscape of the liberation space changed, the memorial system began to be reorganized. Throughout the division, many memorial systems were forgotten in public space. However, the importance of the memorial ceremony for the soldiers and police who died was further emphasized. Through the Yeosu-Suncheon Incident and the battle on the 38th parallel, the status of the memorial ceremony for war dead was strengthened, while the scale of the implementation of the memorial ceremony was expanded. Throughout the war, the date of the three-gun joint memorial ceremony began to be regularized for the first time. In addition, on the day of the memorial service, the Republic of Korea requested the voluntary participation of the people through public action guidelines such as prohibition of drinking and dancing, silence, and self-reflection. However, as can be seen from the issue of the support of bereaved families, the gap between the state and the people regarding the decree still existed. Nevertheless, the three-gun joint memorial system was regularized on a nationwide scale under the leadership of the state, and became a representative memorial ceremony in Korea.","PeriodicalId":206821,"journal":{"name":"The Association for Korean Modern and Contemporary History","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Association for Korean Modern and Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29004/jkmch.2023.06.105.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The eight years before and after the division were the turbulent times of liberation, division, and war. This period required cultural planning to create members of a new era and group. During this period, the memorial was a major plan to secure the legitimacy of the group and form the identity of internal members through the meaning of death and the hierarchy of death. To this end, a memorial ceremony was held for the death of various ethnic groups from the past to the present immediately after liberation. The left and right sides each selected the object of the memorial ceremony and held a memorial ceremony to secure public support. However, as the political landscape of the liberation space changed, the memorial system began to be reorganized. Throughout the division, many memorial systems were forgotten in public space. However, the importance of the memorial ceremony for the soldiers and police who died was further emphasized. Through the Yeosu-Suncheon Incident and the battle on the 38th parallel, the status of the memorial ceremony for war dead was strengthened, while the scale of the implementation of the memorial ceremony was expanded. Throughout the war, the date of the three-gun joint memorial ceremony began to be regularized for the first time. In addition, on the day of the memorial service, the Republic of Korea requested the voluntary participation of the people through public action guidelines such as prohibition of drinking and dancing, silence, and self-reflection. However, as can be seen from the issue of the support of bereaved families, the gap between the state and the people regarding the decree still existed. Nevertheless, the three-gun joint memorial system was regularized on a nationwide scale under the leadership of the state, and became a representative memorial ceremony in Korea.
纪念仪式的改组及师团前后仪式的变化(1945~1953年)
分裂前后的8年是解放、分裂、战争的动荡时期。这一时期需要文化规划来创造一个新时代和新群体的成员。在这一时期,通过死亡的意义和死亡的等级制度,纪念是一个重要的计划,以确保集团的合法性,并形成内部成员的身份。为此,解放后立即举行了从过去到现在各民族死亡的追悼仪式。左右双方分别选定了追悼对象,并举行了追悼仪式,以确保国民的支持。然而,随着解放空间政治格局的变化,纪念系统开始重新组织。在整个分区中,许多纪念系统被遗忘在公共空间中。但是,为牺牲的士兵和警察举行追悼仪式的重要性得到了进一步强调。通过“丽水-顺天事变”和“三八线战役”,亡灵追悼仪式的地位得到了加强,追悼仪式的实施规模也得到了扩大。在整个战争期间,三炮联合纪念仪式的日期首次开始规范化。此外,韩国政府在追悼仪式当天,通过禁止饮酒、跳舞、沉默、反省等公共行动方针,要求国民自愿参与。但是,从对遗属的救助问题上可以看出,国家和人民对于该法令的分歧仍然存在。尽管如此,在国家的领导下,三炮联合祭奠制度在全国范围内正规化,成为韩国代表性的祭奠仪式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信