Building Recommendations for Conducting Equity-Focused, High Quality K-12 Computer Science Education Research

Monica Mcgill, S. Heckman, Christos Chytas, Lien Diaz, Michael Liut, V. Kazakova, I. T. Sanusi, Selina Marianna Shah, Claudia Szabo
{"title":"Building Recommendations for Conducting Equity-Focused, High Quality K-12 Computer Science Education Research","authors":"Monica Mcgill, S. Heckman, Christos Chytas, Lien Diaz, Michael Liut, V. Kazakova, I. T. Sanusi, Selina Marianna Shah, Claudia Szabo","doi":"10.1145/3587103.3594207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate and identify promising practices in equitable K-12 computer science (CS) education, the capacity for education researchers to conduct this research must be rapidly built globally. Simultaneously, concerns have arisen over the last few years about the quality of research that is being conducted and the lack of equity-focused research. In this working group, we will tackle the research question: In what ways can previous research standards inform high-quality, equity-focused K-12 CS education research? We will use existing research and various standards bodies (e.g., European Educational Research Association, Australian Education Research Organisation, CONSORT, American Psychological Association) to synthesize key features in the context of equity-focused K-12 CS education research. We will then vet these attributes with experts who can provide feedback and refine our recommendations and guidelines. Our working group will select the experts using a strata reflecting a diversity of backgrounds and experiences to support our focus on student populations that have been historically marginalized in computing (e.g., low-income students, rural students, girls, students with disabilities). Our recommendations will directly impact future equitable computing education research by providing guidance on conducting high-quality research such that the findings can be aggregated and impact future policy with evidence-based results. While we recognize that different countries and regions may yield differing answers to this question, our recommendations will be robust enough that researchers in each country or region may choose to use those most appropriate to their context.","PeriodicalId":366365,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587103.3594207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To investigate and identify promising practices in equitable K-12 computer science (CS) education, the capacity for education researchers to conduct this research must be rapidly built globally. Simultaneously, concerns have arisen over the last few years about the quality of research that is being conducted and the lack of equity-focused research. In this working group, we will tackle the research question: In what ways can previous research standards inform high-quality, equity-focused K-12 CS education research? We will use existing research and various standards bodies (e.g., European Educational Research Association, Australian Education Research Organisation, CONSORT, American Psychological Association) to synthesize key features in the context of equity-focused K-12 CS education research. We will then vet these attributes with experts who can provide feedback and refine our recommendations and guidelines. Our working group will select the experts using a strata reflecting a diversity of backgrounds and experiences to support our focus on student populations that have been historically marginalized in computing (e.g., low-income students, rural students, girls, students with disabilities). Our recommendations will directly impact future equitable computing education research by providing guidance on conducting high-quality research such that the findings can be aggregated and impact future policy with evidence-based results. While we recognize that different countries and regions may yield differing answers to this question, our recommendations will be robust enough that researchers in each country or region may choose to use those most appropriate to their context.
为开展以公平为中心的高质量K-12计算机科学教育研究建立建议
为了调查和确定公平的K-12计算机科学(CS)教育中有前途的做法,必须在全球迅速建立教育研究人员进行这项研究的能力。与此同时,在过去几年里,人们对正在进行的研究的质量以及缺乏以股票为重点的研究感到担忧。在这个工作组中,我们将解决研究问题:以前的研究标准如何为高质量、以公平为中心的K-12计算机科学教育研究提供信息?我们将利用现有的研究和各种标准机构(例如,欧洲教育研究协会,澳大利亚教育研究组织,CONSORT,美国心理协会)来综合以公平为重点的K-12 CS教育研究背景下的关键特征。然后,我们将与专家一起审查这些属性,专家可以提供反馈并完善我们的建议和指导方针。我们的工作组将使用反映背景和经验多样性的阶层来选择专家,以支持我们对在计算机领域历史上被边缘化的学生群体的关注(例如,低收入学生、农村学生、女孩、残疾学生)。我们的建议将直接影响未来的公平计算教育研究,为开展高质量的研究提供指导,使研究结果能够汇总,并以循证结果影响未来的政策。虽然我们认识到不同的国家和地区可能会对这个问题产生不同的答案,但我们的建议将足够有力,以便每个国家或地区的研究人员可以选择使用最适合其背景的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信