Fatigue analysis of existing railway bridges: strengthening through geometry improvement

Hans Pétursson
{"title":"Fatigue analysis of existing railway bridges: strengthening through geometry improvement","authors":"Hans Pétursson","doi":"10.2749/prague.2022.0515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fatigue analyses of steel bridges are usually based on nominal stresses and available detail categories. Assessment of existing railway bridges often show that the theoretical service life has expired although there are no visible cracks on the bridge. This is partly because results from fatigue testing have large scatter, leading to low design values. Another explanation is that the calculation methods are simple and not very accurate and that the many conservative simplifications that are made lead to an overestimation of the actual fatigue stress range and an underestimation of fatigue strength.To carry out better assessments, the Swedish Transport Administration has studied a structural detail that consists of a gusset plate welded to a flange. This paper will present results from fatigue test of three steel beams with details corresponding to detail number 5 in table 8.4 EN 1993-1-9 [1]. Furthermore, fatigue tests and research in literature are analysed to investigate if the detail category can be elevated from detail nr. 4 by grinding a radius that is smaller than the radius that is specified in EN 1993-1-8 for detail nr 5 in table 8.4. The results have been introduced in the Swedish codes for assessment and maintenance of bridges.","PeriodicalId":168532,"journal":{"name":"IABSE Symposium, Prague 2022: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IABSE Symposium, Prague 2022: Challenges for Existing and Oncoming Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2749/prague.2022.0515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fatigue analyses of steel bridges are usually based on nominal stresses and available detail categories. Assessment of existing railway bridges often show that the theoretical service life has expired although there are no visible cracks on the bridge. This is partly because results from fatigue testing have large scatter, leading to low design values. Another explanation is that the calculation methods are simple and not very accurate and that the many conservative simplifications that are made lead to an overestimation of the actual fatigue stress range and an underestimation of fatigue strength.To carry out better assessments, the Swedish Transport Administration has studied a structural detail that consists of a gusset plate welded to a flange. This paper will present results from fatigue test of three steel beams with details corresponding to detail number 5 in table 8.4 EN 1993-1-9 [1]. Furthermore, fatigue tests and research in literature are analysed to investigate if the detail category can be elevated from detail nr. 4 by grinding a radius that is smaller than the radius that is specified in EN 1993-1-8 for detail nr 5 in table 8.4. The results have been introduced in the Swedish codes for assessment and maintenance of bridges.
既有铁路桥梁的疲劳分析:通过几何改进进行加固
钢桥的疲劳分析通常基于名义应力和可用的细部分类。对既有铁路桥梁的评估往往表明,虽然桥梁上没有明显的裂缝,但理论使用寿命已经过期。这部分是因为疲劳测试的结果有很大的分散,导致设计值较低。另一种解释是,计算方法简单,不是很准确,许多保守的简化导致了对实际疲劳应力范围的高估和对疲劳强度的低估。为了进行更好的评估,瑞典运输管理局研究了一个结构细节,该结构细节由焊接在法兰上的钢板组成。本文将介绍三根钢梁的疲劳试验结果,其细部与表8.4 EN 1993-1-9[1]中的细部编号5相对应。此外,对疲劳试验和文献研究进行了分析,以调查是否可以通过磨削半径小于EN 1993-1-8表8.4中对细节nr. 5规定的半径来提高细节类别。研究结果已被纳入瑞典桥梁评估和维护规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信