Failure Mode and Effects Analysis on the Hydraulic System of Aircraft Ilyushin-76

Heshmat Mohamad Khanlo, Ali Mohammad Mahmodi Kohan
{"title":"Failure Mode and Effects Analysis on the Hydraulic System of Aircraft Ilyushin-76","authors":"Heshmat Mohamad Khanlo, Ali Mohammad Mahmodi Kohan","doi":"10.30699/ijrrs.5.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of accidents in industrial and aerospace environments has increased with the increase of activities in this field and the use of machinery. In traditional systems, after accidents and irreparable damage occur, research is done to investigate the defects and their causes. But today, due to the existence of different methods of hazard identification and risk assessment, before the occurrence of accidents, it is possible to identify accident hotspots and critical areas and to prevent and control them. Reviewing the analysis of failure modes and their effects (FMEA) is one of the industry's common risk assessment methods. Its purpose is to analyze the failure to obtain a comprehensive repair program that leads to the continuation of the operation of physical assets. In this study, with the help of the FMEA method, the risk priority number of the Ilyushin-76 aircraft hydraulic system was calculated, and its critical parts were identified. Due to the shortcomings of the usual risk priority number in the FMEA method, side methods of aggregation of ideas and Schaefer evidence theory were used to calculate the risk priority number. Using these methods, involving probabilities in the expression of opinion, the results of determining critical components became closer to reality. From the results obtained from the study and evaluation of critical components by the two usual RPN methods and Schaefer evidence theory, nine highly critical components are obtained jointly.","PeriodicalId":395350,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reliability, Risk and Safety: Theory and Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijrrs.5.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of accidents in industrial and aerospace environments has increased with the increase of activities in this field and the use of machinery. In traditional systems, after accidents and irreparable damage occur, research is done to investigate the defects and their causes. But today, due to the existence of different methods of hazard identification and risk assessment, before the occurrence of accidents, it is possible to identify accident hotspots and critical areas and to prevent and control them. Reviewing the analysis of failure modes and their effects (FMEA) is one of the industry's common risk assessment methods. Its purpose is to analyze the failure to obtain a comprehensive repair program that leads to the continuation of the operation of physical assets. In this study, with the help of the FMEA method, the risk priority number of the Ilyushin-76 aircraft hydraulic system was calculated, and its critical parts were identified. Due to the shortcomings of the usual risk priority number in the FMEA method, side methods of aggregation of ideas and Schaefer evidence theory were used to calculate the risk priority number. Using these methods, involving probabilities in the expression of opinion, the results of determining critical components became closer to reality. From the results obtained from the study and evaluation of critical components by the two usual RPN methods and Schaefer evidence theory, nine highly critical components are obtained jointly.
伊尔76型飞机液压系统失效模式及影响分析
随着工业和航空航天领域活动的增加和机械的使用,工业和航空航天环境中事故的出现也有所增加。在传统系统中,在发生事故和不可挽回的损害后,对缺陷及其原因进行研究。但在今天,由于存在不同的危害识别和风险评估方法,在事故发生之前,可以识别事故热点和关键区域,并对其进行预防和控制。失效模式及其影响分析(FMEA)是业界常用的风险评估方法之一。其目的是对故障进行分析,以获得一个全面的修复方案,从而导致实物资产的继续运营。本研究利用FMEA方法计算了伊尔76飞机液压系统的风险优先级数,并对其关键部件进行了识别。针对FMEA方法中常用的风险优先级数存在的不足,采用了思想聚合的侧面方法和Schaefer证据理论来计算风险优先级数。使用这些方法,在表达意见时考虑到概率,确定关键成分的结果更接近现实。根据常用的两种RPN方法和Schaefer证据理论对关键分量的研究和评价结果,共同得到了9个高度关键分量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信