Indigenous Polygyny in Dhofar. (Re-)Interpretations of Individual Options and Daring Delineations

A. Profanter, S. Cate
{"title":"Indigenous Polygyny in Dhofar. (Re-)Interpretations of Individual Options and Daring Delineations","authors":"A. Profanter, S. Cate","doi":"10.32380/ALRJ.V43I1.1746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polygyny is widely practiced across Dhofar reflecting the resiliency of Islamic family law. However, as the country is accommodating transnational influences polygynous marital arrangements are undergoing changes. Drawing on qualitative data collected within a large-scale quantitative study comprising a sample of 1,192 respondents on polygyny in Dhofar 2004–2010, the entanglements between religious mores on and cultural practices of polygyny are discussed through individual case-work analysis. First, it is argued that polygynous marriage remains a pragmatic arrangement in the context of tribal relationships. Second, the tension in redefining gender roles is manifest primarily in this marital arrangement. Third, through cultural flow and technological, economic, and educational changes, re-interpretation of mating strategies are encompassing a slow shift from pragmatism to romanticism. The digital nature of communications and cultural identity acquisition in the twenty-first century continues to influence and guide the manifestations of change presented by the data that show the small but vital steps being made by men and women that are redefining and reinterpreting polygyny and society as a whole.","PeriodicalId":215420,"journal":{"name":"Al-Raida Journal","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Raida Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32380/ALRJ.V43I1.1746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polygyny is widely practiced across Dhofar reflecting the resiliency of Islamic family law. However, as the country is accommodating transnational influences polygynous marital arrangements are undergoing changes. Drawing on qualitative data collected within a large-scale quantitative study comprising a sample of 1,192 respondents on polygyny in Dhofar 2004–2010, the entanglements between religious mores on and cultural practices of polygyny are discussed through individual case-work analysis. First, it is argued that polygynous marriage remains a pragmatic arrangement in the context of tribal relationships. Second, the tension in redefining gender roles is manifest primarily in this marital arrangement. Third, through cultural flow and technological, economic, and educational changes, re-interpretation of mating strategies are encompassing a slow shift from pragmatism to romanticism. The digital nature of communications and cultural identity acquisition in the twenty-first century continues to influence and guide the manifestations of change presented by the data that show the small but vital steps being made by men and women that are redefining and reinterpreting polygyny and society as a whole.
佐法尔的土著一夫多妻制。(重新)个人选择的解释和大胆的描绘
一夫多妻制在佐法尔广泛实行,反映了伊斯兰家庭法的弹性。然而,由于该国正在适应跨国影响,一夫多妻婚姻安排正在发生变化。根据2004-2010年在多法尔对1192名受访者进行的一项大规模定量研究中收集的定性数据,通过个案分析讨论了一夫多妻制的宗教习俗和文化习俗之间的纠缠。首先,有人认为一夫多妻制在部落关系的背景下仍然是一种实用的安排。其次,重新定义性别角色的紧张主要体现在这种婚姻安排上。第三,通过文化流动和技术、经济和教育的变化,对择偶策略的重新解读正包含着从实用主义到浪漫主义的缓慢转变。21世纪通信和文化认同获取的数字性质继续影响和指导着数据所呈现的变化表现,这些数据表明,男性和女性正在采取微小但至关重要的步骤,重新定义和解释一夫多妻制和整个社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信