Evaluating the Level of Inter Professional Communication and Collaboration Self-Efficacy and Empathy with Patients among Medical Residents in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, 2020

Mohadese Baghian, Z. Salimi, F. Keshmiri, Parisa Ghasemi Noghabi, R. Bidaki, Fatemeh Hoseini Kasnavie, Tahere Sadeghyie, Farima Fallah Tafti
{"title":"Evaluating the Level of Inter Professional Communication and Collaboration Self-Efficacy and Empathy with Patients among Medical Residents in Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, 2020","authors":"Mohadese Baghian, Z. Salimi, F. Keshmiri, Parisa Ghasemi Noghabi, R. Bidaki, Fatemeh Hoseini Kasnavie, Tahere Sadeghyie, Farima Fallah Tafti","doi":"10.18502/jsbch.v7i1.12802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Medical assistants spend numerous hours of their day in the work environment, which may influence their performance. Empathy with the patients has a significant impact on the treatment process. This study was conducted among residents of different medical disciplines to determine self-efficacy in inter professional collaboration and empathy in dealing with the patients. \nMethods:  This was a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study on all medical residents at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. Data was collected via the following questionnaires: demographic (including age, gender, marital status, year of study, and specialty), Jefferson’s scale of empathy, self-efficacy, and Hagemeier’s interring professional collaboration. \nResults: Of the 162 questionnaires distributed, 135 were received (response rate = 83.33%). The mean age and work experience were 31.42 ± 4.56 and 2.70 ± 4.18 years, respectively. Self-efficacy scores in inter professional cooperation and teamwork was at a good level and empathy scores were at a moderate level. There was a significant relationship between marital status and self-efficacy (p = 0.03). Empathy was related to medical residents’ level of interest in their field (p = 0.019). There was no gender difference in empathy (p = 0.77) and self-efficacy scores (p = 0.36). However, males had higher inter professional communication scores compared to females (p = 0.001). Psychiatric residents had the highest and orthopedic residents had the lowest scores in empathy with the patients, empathic patient care, and emotional separation.  \nConclusion: This study showed that medical residents had an acceptable level of self-efficacy and empathy, which differed among medical fields. Similar studies should be conducted to therefore assemble an educational program for medical residents to increase empathic patient care and achieve inter professional cooperation goals.","PeriodicalId":414959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Behavior and Community Health","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Behavior and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jsbch.v7i1.12802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical assistants spend numerous hours of their day in the work environment, which may influence their performance. Empathy with the patients has a significant impact on the treatment process. This study was conducted among residents of different medical disciplines to determine self-efficacy in inter professional collaboration and empathy in dealing with the patients. Methods:  This was a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study on all medical residents at Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. Data was collected via the following questionnaires: demographic (including age, gender, marital status, year of study, and specialty), Jefferson’s scale of empathy, self-efficacy, and Hagemeier’s interring professional collaboration. Results: Of the 162 questionnaires distributed, 135 were received (response rate = 83.33%). The mean age and work experience were 31.42 ± 4.56 and 2.70 ± 4.18 years, respectively. Self-efficacy scores in inter professional cooperation and teamwork was at a good level and empathy scores were at a moderate level. There was a significant relationship between marital status and self-efficacy (p = 0.03). Empathy was related to medical residents’ level of interest in their field (p = 0.019). There was no gender difference in empathy (p = 0.77) and self-efficacy scores (p = 0.36). However, males had higher inter professional communication scores compared to females (p = 0.001). Psychiatric residents had the highest and orthopedic residents had the lowest scores in empathy with the patients, empathic patient care, and emotional separation.  Conclusion: This study showed that medical residents had an acceptable level of self-efficacy and empathy, which differed among medical fields. Similar studies should be conducted to therefore assemble an educational program for medical residents to increase empathic patient care and achieve inter professional cooperation goals.
沙希德·萨杜吉医科大学住院医师专业间沟通协作、自我效能感和对患者共情水平评估,亚兹德,2020
背景:医疗助理每天在工作环境中花费大量时间,这可能会影响他们的工作表现。与患者共情对治疗过程有显著影响。本研究以不同医学学科的住院医师为研究对象,探讨他们在跨专业合作及与病人共情时的自我效能感。方法:这是一项描述性分析的横断面研究,研究对象是沙希德·萨杜吉医学科学大学的所有住院医生。数据通过以下问卷收集:人口统计(包括年龄、性别、婚姻状况、学习年份、专业)、Jefferson的共情量表、自我效能感和Hagemeier的交叉专业协作。结果:共发放问卷162份,回收问卷135份,回收率为83.33%。平均年龄31.42±4.56岁,平均工作经验2.70±4.18岁。跨专业合作和团队合作的自我效能得分处于良好水平,共情得分处于中等水平。婚姻状况与自我效能感有显著相关(p = 0.03)。共情与住院医师对其领域的兴趣水平相关(p = 0.019)。共情(p = 0.77)和自我效能得分(p = 0.36)无性别差异。然而,男性的职业间沟通得分高于女性(p = 0.001)。精神科住院医师在与病人共情、共情病人护理和情绪分离方面得分最高,骨科住院医师得分最低。结论:本研究显示住院医师的自我效能感和共情处于可接受的水平,但在不同医学领域存在差异。因此,应该进行类似的研究,为住院医师提供一个教育计划,以增加移情病人护理和实现专业间合作的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信