Ensure program quality: Assessment a necessity

M. Wyne
{"title":"Ensure program quality: Assessment a necessity","authors":"M. Wyne","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an effort to achieve high quality programs and courses both formal and informal measures are used the teaching and learning process through direct and indirect methods. Assessment has become even more important since education institutes show great interest in the educational experience outcomes and how they map to institutional goals as well as to the needs of the society. Institutes either develop a formal internal assessment process or through external accreditation try to continuously improve and revamp their programs. It is now perceived that students are more active in building their knowledge rather than simply listening to the lectures. Assessment of student work therefore helps us to determine the effectiveness of programs from student's point of view. This also gives an opportunity to the students to show us what they have learned and how they can contribute when they graduate. It is therefore all that important, for institutes interested in accreditation, to assess learning outcomes as a component of program review process. The accreditation guidelines in general seek to encourage institutes to think about accreditation as a continuous process and go one step further to data collection, analysis and change in order to ensure good quality program. This paper addresses the necessity of assessment through seeking accreditation and also provides a more structured mechanism for accessing, evaluating and improving the quality of the program. This paper details various assessment tools (AMS, Web-Based, Directory Structure, etc.) used by different institutes, to help in organization and gathering of the related material. The paper also presents a model for sharing responsibilities to monitor and evaluate gathered material and assessment data.","PeriodicalId":244961,"journal":{"name":"IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE EDUCON 2010 Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2010.5492396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

In an effort to achieve high quality programs and courses both formal and informal measures are used the teaching and learning process through direct and indirect methods. Assessment has become even more important since education institutes show great interest in the educational experience outcomes and how they map to institutional goals as well as to the needs of the society. Institutes either develop a formal internal assessment process or through external accreditation try to continuously improve and revamp their programs. It is now perceived that students are more active in building their knowledge rather than simply listening to the lectures. Assessment of student work therefore helps us to determine the effectiveness of programs from student's point of view. This also gives an opportunity to the students to show us what they have learned and how they can contribute when they graduate. It is therefore all that important, for institutes interested in accreditation, to assess learning outcomes as a component of program review process. The accreditation guidelines in general seek to encourage institutes to think about accreditation as a continuous process and go one step further to data collection, analysis and change in order to ensure good quality program. This paper addresses the necessity of assessment through seeking accreditation and also provides a more structured mechanism for accessing, evaluating and improving the quality of the program. This paper details various assessment tools (AMS, Web-Based, Directory Structure, etc.) used by different institutes, to help in organization and gathering of the related material. The paper also presents a model for sharing responsibilities to monitor and evaluate gathered material and assessment data.
确保程序质量:评估是必要的
为了达到高质量的计划和课程,通过直接和间接的方法,在教学和学习过程中使用了正式和非正式的措施。由于教育机构对教育经验成果以及它们如何与机构目标和社会需求相匹配表现出极大的兴趣,因此评估变得更加重要。学院要么制定正式的内部评估流程,要么通过外部认证不断改进和改进他们的项目。现在人们认为学生们更积极地积累知识,而不仅仅是听讲。因此,对学生作业的评估有助于我们从学生的角度确定课程的有效性。这也给了学生们一个机会向我们展示他们学到了什么,以及他们毕业后如何做出贡献。因此,对于对认证感兴趣的学院来说,将学习成果评估作为项目审查过程的一个组成部分是非常重要的。总体而言,认证指南旨在鼓励机构将认证视为一个持续的过程,并进一步收集、分析和更改数据,以确保高质量的项目。本文阐述了通过寻求认证进行评估的必要性,并提供了一个更结构化的机制来获取、评估和提高项目的质量。本文详细介绍了不同机构使用的各种评估工具(AMS, Web-Based, Directory Structure等),以帮助组织和收集相关材料。本文还提出了一个分担监督和评估收集到的材料和评估数据的责任的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信