Evaluation of three specification-based testing criteria

Aynur Abdurazik, P. Ammann, W. Ding, Jeff Offutt
{"title":"Evaluation of three specification-based testing criteria","authors":"Aynur Abdurazik, P. Ammann, W. Ding, Jeff Offutt","doi":"10.1109/ICECCS.2000.873943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares three specification-based testing criteria using Mathur and Wong's PROBSUBSUMES measure. The three criteria are specification-mutation coverage, full predicate coverage, and transition-pair coverage. A novel aspect of the work is that each criterion is encoded in a model checker, and the model checker is used first to generate test sets for each criterion and then to evaluate test sets against alternate criteria. Significantly, the use of the model checker for generation of test sets eliminates human bias from this phase of the experiment. The strengths and weaknesses of the criteria are discussed.","PeriodicalId":228728,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Sixth IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems. ICECCS 2000","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Sixth IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems. ICECCS 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS.2000.873943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

This paper compares three specification-based testing criteria using Mathur and Wong's PROBSUBSUMES measure. The three criteria are specification-mutation coverage, full predicate coverage, and transition-pair coverage. A novel aspect of the work is that each criterion is encoded in a model checker, and the model checker is used first to generate test sets for each criterion and then to evaluate test sets against alternate criteria. Significantly, the use of the model checker for generation of test sets eliminates human bias from this phase of the experiment. The strengths and weaknesses of the criteria are discussed.
评估三个基于规范的测试标准
本文使用Mathur和Wong的PROBSUBSUMES度量方法比较了三种基于规范的测试标准。这三个标准是规范突变覆盖、全谓词覆盖和转换对覆盖。这项工作的一个新颖方面是,每个标准都在模型检查器中编码,模型检查器首先用于为每个标准生成测试集,然后根据备用标准评估测试集。值得注意的是,使用模型检查器生成测试集消除了实验这一阶段的人为偏见。讨论了这些标准的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信