Prophylactic Effect of Simultaneous Placement of Mesh on Incidence of Parastomal Hernia After Miles' Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Xu Gao, Ruo-fan Li, Li-xin Sun, Zuo-Jun Liu, Guangliang Tian, Huidong Qi, Xiao-Bin Li
{"title":"Prophylactic Effect of Simultaneous Placement of Mesh on Incidence of Parastomal Hernia After Miles' Surgical Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Study.","authors":"Xu Gao, Ruo-fan Li, Li-xin Sun, Zuo-Jun Liu, Guangliang Tian, Huidong Qi, Xiao-Bin Li","doi":"10.21203/RS.3.RS-243315/V1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nTo assess the prophylactic effect of simultaneous placement of mesh and the incidence of parastomal hernia (PSH) after abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis study included real-world data of 56 surgically resected patients with colorectal cancer who were consecutively assigned to two groups: control (no mesh, n = 32) and experimental (received mesh, n = 24). An artificial patch was placed under the tunica vaginalis of rectus abdominis for patients in the experimental group, whereas those in the control group received routine sigmoidostomy. The median follow-up time was >20 mo. The difference in hazards function was analyzed by cox regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meir analysis was used to determine the survival curves. A P value of <0.05 was considered as significant.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe postoperative incidence rate of PSH was lower in the experimental (41.7%) group than in the control group (71.9%; P = 0.045). The PSH postoperative time in the experimental group was significantly delayed compared to the control group (48 mo versus 10 mo; P < 0.001). The risk of progression from H1 to H2 was less in the experimental group compared to the control group (49.28% versus 60.86%; P = 0.14).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nProphylactic mesh placement significantly prolonged postoperative time for the recurrence of PSH. The incidence of recurrence of H2 (severe PSH) requiring secondary surgical repair was also reduced.","PeriodicalId":191568,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of surgical research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of surgical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/RS.3.RS-243315/V1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION To assess the prophylactic effect of simultaneous placement of mesh and the incidence of parastomal hernia (PSH) after abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer. METHODS This study included real-world data of 56 surgically resected patients with colorectal cancer who were consecutively assigned to two groups: control (no mesh, n = 32) and experimental (received mesh, n = 24). An artificial patch was placed under the tunica vaginalis of rectus abdominis for patients in the experimental group, whereas those in the control group received routine sigmoidostomy. The median follow-up time was >20 mo. The difference in hazards function was analyzed by cox regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meir analysis was used to determine the survival curves. A P value of <0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS The postoperative incidence rate of PSH was lower in the experimental (41.7%) group than in the control group (71.9%; P = 0.045). The PSH postoperative time in the experimental group was significantly delayed compared to the control group (48 mo versus 10 mo; P < 0.001). The risk of progression from H1 to H2 was less in the experimental group compared to the control group (49.28% versus 60.86%; P = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic mesh placement significantly prolonged postoperative time for the recurrence of PSH. The incidence of recurrence of H2 (severe PSH) requiring secondary surgical repair was also reduced.
同时放置补片预防Miles结直肠癌术后造口旁疝发生率的前瞻性研究。
前言:探讨同时放置补片的预防效果及腹会阴直肠癌切除术后造口旁疝(PSH)的发生率。方法本研究纳入56例手术切除的结直肠癌患者的真实数据,将其连续分为两组:对照组(未补片,n = 32)和实验组(接受补片,n = 24)。实验组在腹直肌阴道膜下放置人工补片,对照组常规乙状结肠造口术。中位随访时间>20个月。采用cox回归分析危险函数的差异。Kaplan-Meir分析确定生存曲线。P值<0.05为显著性。结果实验组术后PSH发生率(41.7%)低于对照组(71.9%);p = 0.045)。与对照组相比,实验组PSH术后时间明显延迟(48个月vs 10个月;p < 0.001)。与对照组相比,实验组从H1进展为H2的风险较低(49.28%对60.86%;p = 0.14)。结论预防性补片可明显延长PSH术后复发时间。H2(严重PSH)需要二次手术修复的复发率也降低了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信