Problems and solutions in dating Nabataean pottery of the post-annexation period

T. Erickson-Gini
{"title":"Problems and solutions in dating Nabataean pottery of the post-annexation period","authors":"T. Erickson-Gini","doi":"10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the desert regions of the Southern Levant, the dating of Nabataean sherds and vessels is a critical factor in determining the dates of archaeological strata, architecture, and even entire sites. In recent years, archaeologists working at Petra and related sites have tended to date most Nabataean sherds and vessels to the 1st century CE based on the proposed typo-chronology of the Swiss–Liechtenstein excavations at al-Zantur in Petra, published by Stephan G. Schmid (2000). Accepted typo-chronologies must withstand scrutiny and can override imposed historical frameworks. However, an uncritical reliance on the ez-Zantur chronology has created an artificial gap in the material record of Petra and other Nabataean sites in the post-annexation period, that is to say, the 2nd and 3rd century CE. This paper provides a critique of the Nabataean fine-ware typo-chronology from ez-Zantur, based on finds from other excavations and sites, and proposes a revised chronology in which the production of Nabataean pottery, including painted and unpainted fine wares, unguentaria and lamps, continues unabated throughout the Middle Roman period until sometime in the first half of the 3rd century CE. The revised typo-chronology evinces a robust period of Nabataean culture at Petra and other related sites under Roman rule, like that found in other cities of the Roman East.","PeriodicalId":156819,"journal":{"name":"Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the desert regions of the Southern Levant, the dating of Nabataean sherds and vessels is a critical factor in determining the dates of archaeological strata, architecture, and even entire sites. In recent years, archaeologists working at Petra and related sites have tended to date most Nabataean sherds and vessels to the 1st century CE based on the proposed typo-chronology of the Swiss–Liechtenstein excavations at al-Zantur in Petra, published by Stephan G. Schmid (2000). Accepted typo-chronologies must withstand scrutiny and can override imposed historical frameworks. However, an uncritical reliance on the ez-Zantur chronology has created an artificial gap in the material record of Petra and other Nabataean sites in the post-annexation period, that is to say, the 2nd and 3rd century CE. This paper provides a critique of the Nabataean fine-ware typo-chronology from ez-Zantur, based on finds from other excavations and sites, and proposes a revised chronology in which the production of Nabataean pottery, including painted and unpainted fine wares, unguentaria and lamps, continues unabated throughout the Middle Roman period until sometime in the first half of the 3rd century CE. The revised typo-chronology evinces a robust period of Nabataean culture at Petra and other related sites under Roman rule, like that found in other cities of the Roman East.
吞并后时期纳巴泰陶器年代测定的问题与解决办法
在黎凡特南部的沙漠地区,纳巴泰碎片和船只的年代是确定考古地层、建筑甚至整个遗址年代的关键因素。近年来,在佩特拉和相关遗址工作的考古学家倾向于根据提出的瑞士-列支敦士登在佩特拉al-Zantur挖掘的排印年表,将大多数纳巴泰碎片和船只的年代确定为公元1世纪,该年表由Stephan G. Schmid(2000)出版。公认的印刷年表必须经得起审查,并且可以推翻强加的历史框架。然而,对埃兹-赞特尔年表的不加批判的依赖造成了佩特拉和其他纳巴泰遗址在吞并后时期(即公元2世纪和3世纪)的材料记录的人为空白。本文根据其他发掘和遗址的发现,对埃兹赞特尔的纳巴泰精细陶器印刷年表进行了批评,并提出了一个修订的年表,其中纳巴泰陶器的生产,包括彩绘和未彩绘的精美陶器,unguentaria和灯具,在整个罗马中期一直持续到公元3世纪上半叶的某个时候。修订后的排印年表表明,在佩特拉和罗马统治下的其他相关遗址,有一段繁荣的纳巴泰文化时期,就像在罗马东部的其他城市发现的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信