Deep Learning Models for Water Potability Classification in Rural Areas in the Philippines

Argeen Blanco, Lance Victor Del Rosario, Ken Ichiro Jose, Melchizedek I. Alipio
{"title":"Deep Learning Models for Water Potability Classification in Rural Areas in the Philippines","authors":"Argeen Blanco, Lance Victor Del Rosario, Ken Ichiro Jose, Melchizedek I. Alipio","doi":"10.1109/aiiot54504.2022.9817352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the World Bank, one out of five Filipinos do not get water from formal sources. Only 77% of the rural population and 90% of those in urban areas have access to an improved water source and only 44% have direct house connections. Surveillance of water quality is mandatory thus many research studies have been presented to different communities that showed effective results. In rural areas, there is already a classification model for water potability using traditional machine learning techniques. However, there currently no deep learning-based model for water potability classification. Thus, this work aims to create a deep learning water potability classification model for rural water sources in the Philippines. It starts from importing the water potability dataset of water monitoring sources from rural areas then pre-processing of the data, evaluation of the performance of the learning models through accuracy, precision, recall and f-measure metrics. Out of all the three, MLP had provided the greatest accuracy of 99.80%. LSTM performed better in accuracy and recall in comparison to GRU, but GRU had provided better precision than LSTM. LSTM has been considered to greatly classify the most common classifications in the dataset, while GRU has been observed to accurately classify the infrequent classifications in the dataset.","PeriodicalId":409264,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","volume":"327 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE World AI IoT Congress (AIIoT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/aiiot54504.2022.9817352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

According to the World Bank, one out of five Filipinos do not get water from formal sources. Only 77% of the rural population and 90% of those in urban areas have access to an improved water source and only 44% have direct house connections. Surveillance of water quality is mandatory thus many research studies have been presented to different communities that showed effective results. In rural areas, there is already a classification model for water potability using traditional machine learning techniques. However, there currently no deep learning-based model for water potability classification. Thus, this work aims to create a deep learning water potability classification model for rural water sources in the Philippines. It starts from importing the water potability dataset of water monitoring sources from rural areas then pre-processing of the data, evaluation of the performance of the learning models through accuracy, precision, recall and f-measure metrics. Out of all the three, MLP had provided the greatest accuracy of 99.80%. LSTM performed better in accuracy and recall in comparison to GRU, but GRU had provided better precision than LSTM. LSTM has been considered to greatly classify the most common classifications in the dataset, while GRU has been observed to accurately classify the infrequent classifications in the dataset.
菲律宾农村地区饮用水分类的深度学习模型
根据世界银行的数据,五分之一的菲律宾人没有从正规渠道获得水。只有77%的农村人口和90%的城市人口获得了改善的水源,只有44%的人有直接的住房连接。水质监测是强制性的,因此许多研究已经向不同的社区展示了有效的结果。在农村地区,已经有一个使用传统机器学习技术的饮用水分类模型。然而,目前还没有基于深度学习的饮用水分类模型。因此,这项工作旨在为菲律宾农村水源创建一个深度学习饮用水分类模型。它从从农村地区导入水监测来源的饮用水数据集开始,然后对数据进行预处理,通过准确性、精密度、召回率和f-measure指标评估学习模型的性能。在这三种方法中,MLP的准确率最高,达到99.80%。LSTM在准确率和查全率上均优于GRU,但GRU的查全率优于LSTM。LSTM被认为对数据集中最常见的分类进行了大量的分类,而GRU被认为对数据集中不常见的分类进行了准确的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信