Ethical Leadership and Prohibitive Voice – the Role of Leadership and Organisational Identification

Mari Svendsen, I. Seljeseth, Kjell Ernes
{"title":"Ethical Leadership and Prohibitive Voice – the Role of Leadership and Organisational Identification","authors":"Mari Svendsen, I. Seljeseth, Kjell Ernes","doi":"10.22543/0733.131.1289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article extends previous research on ethical leadership and voice behavior, by investigating the relationship between ethical leadership and prohibitive voice. Prohibitive voice is defined as speaking up with concerns or worries regarding factors that may harm organisational functioning. The article reports on a cross-sectional study of Norwegian employees, investigating the relationship between ethical leadership, leadership identification, organisational identification and prohibitive voice. In the article leadership identification is understood as a process where the employee incorporates the leader’s values and goals into his or her selfconcept. Organisational identification on the other hand is when the employee starts seeing the organisational values, norms and goals as his or her own. Testing our results in a dual-process model, we find that ethical leadership is positively and significantly related to prohibitive voice. Moreover, we find that this effect is mediated by organizational identification. We find no significant mediation effect of leadership identification. Implication for theory and research are discussed.","PeriodicalId":356546,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Values-Based Leadership","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Values-Based Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.131.1289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article extends previous research on ethical leadership and voice behavior, by investigating the relationship between ethical leadership and prohibitive voice. Prohibitive voice is defined as speaking up with concerns or worries regarding factors that may harm organisational functioning. The article reports on a cross-sectional study of Norwegian employees, investigating the relationship between ethical leadership, leadership identification, organisational identification and prohibitive voice. In the article leadership identification is understood as a process where the employee incorporates the leader’s values and goals into his or her selfconcept. Organisational identification on the other hand is when the employee starts seeing the organisational values, norms and goals as his or her own. Testing our results in a dual-process model, we find that ethical leadership is positively and significantly related to prohibitive voice. Moreover, we find that this effect is mediated by organizational identification. We find no significant mediation effect of leadership identification. Implication for theory and research are discussed.
道德领导和禁止的声音-领导和组织认同的作用
本文通过调查伦理型领导和禁止性建言之间的关系,扩展了之前关于伦理型领导和建言的研究。禁止性声音被定义为对可能损害组织功能的因素表达担忧或担忧。文章报告了挪威员工的横断面研究,调查道德领导,领导认同,组织认同和禁止的声音之间的关系。在文章中,领导力识别被理解为一个过程,员工将领导者的价值观和目标纳入他或她的自我概念。另一方面,组织认同是指员工开始将组织的价值观、规范和目标视为自己的。在双过程模型中测试我们的结果,我们发现道德领导与禁止性声音呈正相关且显著。此外,我们发现这种效应是由组织认同介导的。我们发现领导认同没有显著的中介作用。讨论了理论和研究意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信