Effects of sensory stimulation training on gross motor abilities in hemiplegic cerebral palsy

I. Arshad, M. Razzaq, Jaweed Naweed, Sonia Wali, Sumaiyah Obaid, Falak Hameed
{"title":"Effects of sensory stimulation training on gross motor abilities in hemiplegic cerebral palsy","authors":"I. Arshad, M. Razzaq, Jaweed Naweed, Sonia Wali, Sumaiyah Obaid, Falak Hameed","doi":"10.33897/fujrs.v2i1.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cerebral palsy is treated by various techniques but still more advancement is needed to find out the effects of sensory stimulation training on gross motor abilities in patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Objectives: To determine the effect of sensory stimulation training on gross motor abilities in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Methods: A single-blind randomized control trial was conducted at Al Rehman Hospital Phase II, Gulraiz Rawalpindi, spanning over 06 months from Feb 2019 to Jun 2019. The sampling technique was non-probability purposive sampling, Total sample size was 40, calculated through open epi, and randomly allocated into two groups equally by lottery method. Diagnosed hemiplegic cerebral palsy patients between 4 to 14 years of age, of both genders, did not receive special education and were not treated with sensory stimulation therapy, were included while any medical or surgical treatment before or during the study period was excluded. The Control group received Bobath Neurodevelopmental treatment, while the experimental group received sensory stimulation training by using Rody, swivel Cars, Foam Pogo Stick, Wobble Deck, Platform swing, trampoline, and Spooner board training five days a week for 6 weeks. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21, a Normality test was applied and results showed that data was normally distributed as the p-value of Shapiro-Wilk was <0.05. Results: Out of 40 hemiplegic cerebral palsy patients, 20 were in the experimental while 20 were in the control group among them 23(57.5%) were females and 17(42.5%) were males. GMFCS before the training in the experimental group was 3.65 + 0. 67, while in the control group was 3.55 + 0.60 with the P-value of 0.62. After the exercise program, the experimental group was 3.60 + 0.75, and the control group was 3.60 + 0.50 with the P-value of 1.00. Within-group analysis showed before and after training P-value was <0.01 in both experimental and control groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that sensory stimulation training improves gross motor abilities in hemiplegic cerebral palsy.","PeriodicalId":178536,"journal":{"name":"Foundation University Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundation University Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33897/fujrs.v2i1.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral palsy is treated by various techniques but still more advancement is needed to find out the effects of sensory stimulation training on gross motor abilities in patients with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Objectives: To determine the effect of sensory stimulation training on gross motor abilities in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Methods: A single-blind randomized control trial was conducted at Al Rehman Hospital Phase II, Gulraiz Rawalpindi, spanning over 06 months from Feb 2019 to Jun 2019. The sampling technique was non-probability purposive sampling, Total sample size was 40, calculated through open epi, and randomly allocated into two groups equally by lottery method. Diagnosed hemiplegic cerebral palsy patients between 4 to 14 years of age, of both genders, did not receive special education and were not treated with sensory stimulation therapy, were included while any medical or surgical treatment before or during the study period was excluded. The Control group received Bobath Neurodevelopmental treatment, while the experimental group received sensory stimulation training by using Rody, swivel Cars, Foam Pogo Stick, Wobble Deck, Platform swing, trampoline, and Spooner board training five days a week for 6 weeks. Data was analyzed by SPSS 21, a Normality test was applied and results showed that data was normally distributed as the p-value of Shapiro-Wilk was <0.05. Results: Out of 40 hemiplegic cerebral palsy patients, 20 were in the experimental while 20 were in the control group among them 23(57.5%) were females and 17(42.5%) were males. GMFCS before the training in the experimental group was 3.65 + 0. 67, while in the control group was 3.55 + 0.60 with the P-value of 0.62. After the exercise program, the experimental group was 3.60 + 0.75, and the control group was 3.60 + 0.50 with the P-value of 1.00. Within-group analysis showed before and after training P-value was <0.01 in both experimental and control groups. Conclusion: It is concluded that sensory stimulation training improves gross motor abilities in hemiplegic cerebral palsy.
感觉刺激训练对偏瘫性脑瘫大运动能力的影响
背景:脑瘫的治疗方法多种多样,但感觉刺激训练对偏瘫脑瘫患者大运动能力的影响还有待进一步研究。目的:探讨感觉刺激训练对偏瘫性脑瘫大运动能力的影响。方法:2019年2月至2019年6月,在拉瓦尔品第古拉雷兹Al Rehman医院二期进行单盲随机对照试验。抽样方法为非概率目的抽样,总样本量40例,采用开放式epi法计算,采用摇号法随机分为两组。被诊断为偏瘫性脑瘫的患者,年龄在4至14岁之间,不分性别,没有接受过特殊教育,也没有接受过感觉刺激疗法,这些患者被纳入研究对象,而在研究之前或研究期间接受过任何药物或手术治疗的患者被排除在外。对照组接受Bobath神经发育治疗,实验组接受Rody、旋转小车、Foam Pogo Stick、Wobble Deck、Platform swing、蹦床、Spooner board等感官刺激训练,每周5天,持续6周。数据采用SPSS 21进行统计分析,采用正态性检验,结果表明,夏皮罗-威尔克p值<0.05,数据呈正态分布。结果:40例偏瘫脑瘫患者中,实验组20例,对照组20例,其中女性23例(57.5%),男性17例(42.5%)。实验组训练前GMFCS为3.65 + 0。67,对照组为3.55 + 0.60,p值为0.62。运动方案结束后,实验组为3.60 + 0.75,对照组为3.60 + 0.50,p值为1.00。组内分析显示,实验组与对照组训练前后p值均<0.01。结论:感觉刺激训练可提高偏瘫性脑瘫大运动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信