Tell Me What You Want, What You Really, Really Want: Understanding User Perspectives with Comparative Analysis

Zoe Chao
{"title":"Tell Me What You Want, What You Really, Really Want: Understanding User Perspectives with Comparative Analysis","authors":"Zoe Chao","doi":"10.29242/lac.2018.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Comparative Analysis Comparative analysis, or, as the industry calls it, “competitive analysis,” has always been a common practice in evaluating usability. By comparing features with competitors, we can determine the product’s strengths and weaknesses. In his usability engineering model, Nielsen stated that existing products are often the best prototypes at the predesign stage because they are already fully developed.1 So even before building the product, valuable information about what features support user needs and meet user expectations can be collected.2 Useful features can be incorporated into the new product and potential usability problems can be avoided.3","PeriodicalId":193553,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 Library Assessment Conference: Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment: December 5–7, 2018, Houston, TX","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Comparative Analysis Comparative analysis, or, as the industry calls it, “competitive analysis,” has always been a common practice in evaluating usability. By comparing features with competitors, we can determine the product’s strengths and weaknesses. In his usability engineering model, Nielsen stated that existing products are often the best prototypes at the predesign stage because they are already fully developed.1 So even before building the product, valuable information about what features support user needs and meet user expectations can be collected.2 Useful features can be incorporated into the new product and potential usability problems can be avoided.3
告诉我你想要什么,你真正想要什么:用比较分析理解用户的观点
比较分析,或者,正如业界所称的,“竞争分析”,一直是评估可用性的一种常见做法。通过与竞争对手的功能比较,我们可以确定产品的优势和劣势。在他的可用性工程模型中,Nielsen指出,在预设计阶段,现有产品通常是最好的原型,因为它们已经完全开发出来了因此,甚至在构建产品之前,就可以收集有关哪些特性支持用户需求并满足用户期望的有价值的信息可以将有用的功能纳入新产品,并且可以避免潜在的可用性问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信