{"title":"Natural law : Voet's criticism of De Groot","authors":"HJ Erasmus","doi":"10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hugo de Groot (1583-1645) is internationally known as the father of international law and also celebrated for his seminal work on the law of nature. The principal work of Johannes Voet (1647-1713) is his Commentarius ad Pandectas in which he expounds the modern law (the jus hodiernum) in the light of the Pandects of Roman law. In the first title of his Commentary, Voet briefly sets out his views on the foundations of natural law. He rejects the views of De Groot on this score as unacceptable. The purpose of this note is to trace the exposure of De Groot and Voet to the subtleties of the esoteric theological debates in Reformed (Calvinist) circles in seventeenth century Holland, and to highlight the theological background to their differing views on the source of the law of nature.","PeriodicalId":338511,"journal":{"name":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fundamina: a Journal of Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2016/V22N1A3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Hugo de Groot (1583-1645) is internationally known as the father of international law and also celebrated for his seminal work on the law of nature. The principal work of Johannes Voet (1647-1713) is his Commentarius ad Pandectas in which he expounds the modern law (the jus hodiernum) in the light of the Pandects of Roman law. In the first title of his Commentary, Voet briefly sets out his views on the foundations of natural law. He rejects the views of De Groot on this score as unacceptable. The purpose of this note is to trace the exposure of De Groot and Voet to the subtleties of the esoteric theological debates in Reformed (Calvinist) circles in seventeenth century Holland, and to highlight the theological background to their differing views on the source of the law of nature.
雨果·德·格鲁特(Hugo de Groot, 1583-1645)是国际公认的国际法之父,并因其在自然法方面的开创性工作而闻名。约翰内斯·沃特(1647-1713)的主要著作是他的《通论》(Commentarius and Pandectas),其中他根据罗马法的通论阐述了现代法(jus hodiernum)。在《注释》的第一个标题中,沃特简要地阐述了他对自然法基础的看法。他反对德格鲁特在这一点上的观点,认为这是不可接受的。本文的目的是追溯德格鲁特和沃特在17世纪荷兰改革宗(加尔文主义)圈子中深奥神学辩论的微妙之处,并强调他们对自然法则来源的不同观点的神学背景。