Beliefs Related to COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey from India

Swapnajeet Sahoo, J. Pattnaik, S. Padhy, A. Mehra, M. Panigrahi, R. Nehra, S. Grover
{"title":"Beliefs Related to COVID-19 Infection: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey from India","authors":"Swapnajeet Sahoo, J. Pattnaik, S. Padhy, A. Mehra, M. Panigrahi, R. Nehra, S. Grover","doi":"10.4103/wsp.wsp_7_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the prevalence of specific beliefs held by people with respect to SARS-2-CoV (COVID-19) infection. Study Design: Web-based cross-sectional survey by using nonprobability snow-balling sampling technique. Methodology: The survey-specific questionnaire designed based on the review of literature on the prevailing myths/beliefs was circulated by an online cross-sectional survey through the SurveyMonkey® platform using the WhatsApp®, both individually and through the WhatsApp groups, by using a nonprobability snow-balling sampling technique. Results: 1695 people participated in the survey, of which 1636 responses were found to be complete and were analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 34.55 years, and two-thirds of the participants were males (n = 1092). About one-third of the participants were educated up to graduation (32.1%), and about one-fifth were healthcare workers. Incorrect beliefs related to various preventive aspects, modes of spread of infection, and treatments were present in a significant proportion of people, with a wide variation for specific issues. When the number of participants with at least one incorrect belief related to any of the aspects of COVID-19 infection was evaluated, except for four participants, all the participants reported at least one incorrect belief. Male and female participants differed significantly in few beliefs. Conclusions: This survey highlights a widespread prevalence of myths/misconceptions in society regarding various aspects of COVID-19 infection, which warrants more focus on awareness programs.","PeriodicalId":285109,"journal":{"name":"World Social Psychiatry","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wsp.wsp_7_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the prevalence of specific beliefs held by people with respect to SARS-2-CoV (COVID-19) infection. Study Design: Web-based cross-sectional survey by using nonprobability snow-balling sampling technique. Methodology: The survey-specific questionnaire designed based on the review of literature on the prevailing myths/beliefs was circulated by an online cross-sectional survey through the SurveyMonkey® platform using the WhatsApp®, both individually and through the WhatsApp groups, by using a nonprobability snow-balling sampling technique. Results: 1695 people participated in the survey, of which 1636 responses were found to be complete and were analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 34.55 years, and two-thirds of the participants were males (n = 1092). About one-third of the participants were educated up to graduation (32.1%), and about one-fifth were healthcare workers. Incorrect beliefs related to various preventive aspects, modes of spread of infection, and treatments were present in a significant proportion of people, with a wide variation for specific issues. When the number of participants with at least one incorrect belief related to any of the aspects of COVID-19 infection was evaluated, except for four participants, all the participants reported at least one incorrect belief. Male and female participants differed significantly in few beliefs. Conclusions: This survey highlights a widespread prevalence of myths/misconceptions in society regarding various aspects of COVID-19 infection, which warrants more focus on awareness programs.
与COVID-19感染相关的信念:来自印度的横断面网络调查
目的:评估人们对SARS-2-CoV (COVID-19)感染的特定信念的流行程度。研究设计:采用非概率滚雪球抽样技术进行基于网络的横断面调查。方法:基于对流行神话/信念文献的回顾而设计的调查特定问卷,通过使用WhatsApp®的SurveyMonkey®平台进行在线横断面调查,通过单独或通过WhatsApp群组,使用非概率滚雪球抽样技术进行分发。结果:1695人参与了调查,其中1636人回复完整,并进行了分析。参与者的平均年龄为34.55岁,三分之二的参与者为男性(n = 1092)。约三分之一的参与者受过教育直到毕业(32.1%),约五分之一是卫生保健工作者。很大一部分人存在与各种预防方面、感染传播方式和治疗方法有关的不正确信念,具体问题差异很大。当评估与COVID-19感染的任何方面至少有一个错误信念的参与者数量时,除了四名参与者外,所有参与者都报告了至少一个错误信念。男性和女性参与者在一些信念上存在显著差异。结论:这项调查突出表明,社会上普遍存在关于COVID-19感染的各个方面的神话/误解,这需要更多地关注提高认识项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信