Audiences of science communication between pluralisation, fragmentation and polarisation

Mike S. Schäfer, Julia Metag
{"title":"Audiences of science communication between pluralisation, fragmentation and polarisation","authors":"Mike S. Schäfer, Julia Metag","doi":"10.4324/9781003039242-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Audiences have been a major component of how science communication was thought about and conceptualised in scholarly circles. But despite the importance given to audiences in science communication, they were, and still are, often difficult to grasp. This chapter distinguishes between the dissemination, dialogue and conversation models of science communication and shows how audience conceptualisations have developed from a mass ‘lay’ audience, through a dialogue partner to being theorised as stakeholders or conflict parties. It also discusses how plural audiences have come to exist for science communication, differing in their views of science in general or of specific science-related issues, as well as in their use of topical information and their media diet.","PeriodicalId":132183,"journal":{"name":"Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039242-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Audiences have been a major component of how science communication was thought about and conceptualised in scholarly circles. But despite the importance given to audiences in science communication, they were, and still are, often difficult to grasp. This chapter distinguishes between the dissemination, dialogue and conversation models of science communication and shows how audience conceptualisations have developed from a mass ‘lay’ audience, through a dialogue partner to being theorised as stakeholders or conflict parties. It also discusses how plural audiences have come to exist for science communication, differing in their views of science in general or of specific science-related issues, as well as in their use of topical information and their media diet.
科学传播受众的多元化、碎片化和两极分化
受众一直是学术界如何思考和概念化科学传播的主要组成部分。但是,尽管在科学传播中对受众给予了重视,但他们过去是,现在仍然是,往往难以掌握。本章区分了科学传播的传播、对话和对话模式,并展示了受众概念是如何从大众“外行”受众,通过对话伙伴发展到被理论化为利益相关者或冲突方的。它还讨论了科学传播的多元受众是如何存在的,他们对一般科学或特定科学相关问题的看法不同,他们对专题信息的使用不同,他们的媒体饮食也不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信