Keeping Meditation Religious and Psychotherapy Secular

Ira Helderman
{"title":"Keeping Meditation Religious and Psychotherapy Secular","authors":"Ira Helderman","doi":"10.5149/northcarolina/9781469648521.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines psychotherapists personalizing religion approaches to Buddhist teachings and practices. Here clinicians can be dramatically influenced by Buddhist teachings, but, intent on maintaining a clear differentiation between Buddhist and psychotherapeutic practice, are loath to “mix” the two. Deep believing Buddhist clinicians betray no sign of Buddhist influence in actual therapy sessions eschewing embodied practices or explicit discussion of Buddhist concepts. They instead hold their Buddhist identities silently internal within “the person of the therapist,” thus “personalized.” The work of one of the most famous therapists to investigate Buddhist traditions, Erich Fromm, is detailed. Fromm’s innovative reconstructions of the terms “religion” and “secular” remain highly influential today. The chapter then describes contemporary therapists who keep their therapy offices clear of visible signs of Buddhist practice during their work day while, in the evenings, publicly speak on “Zen psychoanalysis” or even lead Buddhist communities. These therapists view their work to be fundamentally Buddhist in nature and their patients will sometimes seek them out precisely for their Buddhist association. Personalizing religion approaches thus blur boundaries between the religious and not-religious based on distinctions between the private and the public, the personal and the professional.","PeriodicalId":240112,"journal":{"name":"Prescribing the Dharma","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prescribing the Dharma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469648521.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines psychotherapists personalizing religion approaches to Buddhist teachings and practices. Here clinicians can be dramatically influenced by Buddhist teachings, but, intent on maintaining a clear differentiation between Buddhist and psychotherapeutic practice, are loath to “mix” the two. Deep believing Buddhist clinicians betray no sign of Buddhist influence in actual therapy sessions eschewing embodied practices or explicit discussion of Buddhist concepts. They instead hold their Buddhist identities silently internal within “the person of the therapist,” thus “personalized.” The work of one of the most famous therapists to investigate Buddhist traditions, Erich Fromm, is detailed. Fromm’s innovative reconstructions of the terms “religion” and “secular” remain highly influential today. The chapter then describes contemporary therapists who keep their therapy offices clear of visible signs of Buddhist practice during their work day while, in the evenings, publicly speak on “Zen psychoanalysis” or even lead Buddhist communities. These therapists view their work to be fundamentally Buddhist in nature and their patients will sometimes seek them out precisely for their Buddhist association. Personalizing religion approaches thus blur boundaries between the religious and not-religious based on distinctions between the private and the public, the personal and the professional.
保持冥想的宗教性和心理治疗的世俗性
本章探讨了心理治疗师对佛教教义和实践的个性化宗教方法。在这里,临床医生可能会受到佛教教义的显著影响,但是,为了保持佛教和心理治疗实践之间的明确区分,他们不愿意将两者“混合”起来。虔诚的佛教临床医生在实际的治疗过程中没有表现出佛教影响的迹象,避开了具体的实践或明确的佛教概念讨论。相反,他们把自己的佛教身份静静地放在“治疗师的人”内部,因此是“个性化的”。埃里希·弗洛姆(Erich Fromm)是研究佛教传统的最著名的治疗师之一,他的工作非常详细。弗洛姆对“宗教”和“世俗”这两个词的创新重构至今仍具有很大影响。然后,这一章描述了当代的治疗师,他们在白天的工作中让他们的治疗办公室远离佛教实践的明显迹象,而在晚上,他们公开谈论“禅宗精神分析”,甚至领导佛教社区。这些治疗师认为他们的工作本质上是佛教的,他们的病人有时会因为他们的佛教联系而找他们。因此,个性化的宗教方法模糊了宗教和非宗教之间的界限,这是基于私人和公共、个人和专业之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信