The United Kingdom's Plan to Reduce Employment Conflict

D. Mangan
{"title":"The United Kingdom's Plan to Reduce Employment Conflict","authors":"D. Mangan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2400675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most lamented aspects of employment relations is attention to employment tribunal procedure. And yet, to this neglected area the Coalition Government has brought in a host of reforms ostensibly to address an economic imperative. This comment considers the employment law reforms contained in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 as well as The Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. This legislative overhaul of employment relations is tied to efforts to improve the country’s economic future. The package of reforms aims in particular to ease the regulatory burden on small to medium-sized businesses. In so doing, there is a noticeable shift resulting in a more aggressive and singular view of employment litigation: workers have been cast in a nefarious role while employers (principally small to medium-sized businesses) are viewed as victims. At their essence, these reforms may well assist employers (though small to medium-sized businesses may not notice a change), but the Act and Regulations present a serious issue regarding access to redress for the infringement of rights in employment law.","PeriodicalId":121229,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: National eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: National eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2400675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most lamented aspects of employment relations is attention to employment tribunal procedure. And yet, to this neglected area the Coalition Government has brought in a host of reforms ostensibly to address an economic imperative. This comment considers the employment law reforms contained in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 as well as The Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. This legislative overhaul of employment relations is tied to efforts to improve the country’s economic future. The package of reforms aims in particular to ease the regulatory burden on small to medium-sized businesses. In so doing, there is a noticeable shift resulting in a more aggressive and singular view of employment litigation: workers have been cast in a nefarious role while employers (principally small to medium-sized businesses) are viewed as victims. At their essence, these reforms may well assist employers (though small to medium-sized businesses may not notice a change), but the Act and Regulations present a serious issue regarding access to redress for the infringement of rights in employment law.
英国减少就业冲突的计划
雇佣关系中最令人遗憾的一个方面是对雇佣法庭程序的关注。然而,联合政府对这个被忽视的领域进行了一系列改革,表面上是为了解决经济问题。本评论考虑了《2013年企业和监管改革法》以及《2013年就业法庭(宪法和程序规则)条例》中所载的就业法改革。这项对雇佣关系的立法改革与改善国家经济前景的努力息息相关。改革方案的主要目的是减轻中小企业的监管负担。在这样做的过程中,有一个明显的转变,导致了一种更激进和单一的就业诉讼观点:工人被塑造成邪恶的角色,而雇主(主要是中小型企业)被视为受害者。从本质上讲,这些改革可能对雇主很有帮助(尽管中小型企业可能不会注意到变化),但《法案和条例》提出了一个严重的问题,即在侵犯就业法权利的情况下如何获得补救。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信