Can quantification of congestive heart failure care convince medical doctors to use a care pathway? A process analysis

T. Heemskerk, M. A. Hugo, Rosalie Mesman, Lilian Jane Förster, M. Götte, Arend Jan te Hoonte
{"title":"Can quantification of congestive heart failure care convince medical doctors to use a care pathway? A process analysis","authors":"T. Heemskerk, M. A. Hugo, Rosalie Mesman, Lilian Jane Förster, M. Götte, Arend Jan te Hoonte","doi":"10.1258/jicp.2012.012001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dutch national health-care policy has two opposing objectives: firstly care has to be cost-effective and secondly the quality of care has to improve. To meet these objectives in the clinical care for congestive heart failure (CHF), the Haga Hospital Heart Centre decided to investigate whether care according to a care pathway would be the solution. The objective of this study was to gain the support of the medical doctors (MDs) for implementation of a CHF care pathway. This was accomplished by providing insight through a process analysis of care as registered in the medical records. The survey was a retrospective process description of the design of the data collection protocol and research process evaluating the current care with international guidelines. The results of the research and the process of data collection facilitated a thorough evaluation of the delivered care. This resulted in an invaluable insight by the MDs into the results and registration of the medical care to CHF patients. In order to reveal the internal urgency of the design and implementation of a care pathway quantification of the care parameters is essential to gain insight into the care processes. With this insight the MDs are more likely to support a care pathway.","PeriodicalId":114083,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Care Pathways","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Care Pathways","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1258/jicp.2012.012001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Dutch national health-care policy has two opposing objectives: firstly care has to be cost-effective and secondly the quality of care has to improve. To meet these objectives in the clinical care for congestive heart failure (CHF), the Haga Hospital Heart Centre decided to investigate whether care according to a care pathway would be the solution. The objective of this study was to gain the support of the medical doctors (MDs) for implementation of a CHF care pathway. This was accomplished by providing insight through a process analysis of care as registered in the medical records. The survey was a retrospective process description of the design of the data collection protocol and research process evaluating the current care with international guidelines. The results of the research and the process of data collection facilitated a thorough evaluation of the delivered care. This resulted in an invaluable insight by the MDs into the results and registration of the medical care to CHF patients. In order to reveal the internal urgency of the design and implementation of a care pathway quantification of the care parameters is essential to gain insight into the care processes. With this insight the MDs are more likely to support a care pathway.
充血性心力衰竭护理的量化能说服医生使用护理途径吗?流程分析
荷兰的国家保健政策有两个相反的目标:首先,保健必须具有成本效益,其次,必须提高保健的质量。为了在充血性心力衰竭(CHF)的临床护理中实现这些目标,Haga医院心脏中心决定调查根据护理途径进行护理是否会成为解决方案。本研究的目的是获得医生(MDs)对实施CHF护理途径的支持。这是通过对医疗记录中记录的护理过程分析提供洞察力来实现的。该调查是对数据收集方案的设计和研究过程的回顾性过程描述,并根据国际指南评估当前的护理。研究结果和数据收集过程促进了对所提供护理的全面评估。这使得医学博士对CHF患者的医疗护理结果和注册有了宝贵的见解。为了揭示设计和实施护理路径的内在紧迫性,护理参数的量化对于深入了解护理过程至关重要。有了这一认识,医学博士更有可能支持护理途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信