Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 speakers

R. Hawkins, S. Al-Eid, Ibrahim Almahboob, P. Athanasopoulos, Rangsiya Chaengchenkit, James Hu, M. J. Rezai, Carol Jaensch, Yunju Jeon, Amy Jiang, Yan-kit Ingrid Leung, Keiko Matsunaga, Martha Ortega, Ghisseh Sarko, Neal Snape, Kalinka Velasco-Zárate
{"title":"Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 speakers","authors":"R. Hawkins, S. Al-Eid, Ibrahim Almahboob, P. Athanasopoulos, Rangsiya Chaengchenkit, James Hu, M. J. Rezai, Carol Jaensch, Yunju Jeon, Amy Jiang, Yan-kit Ingrid Leung, Keiko Matsunaga, Martha Ortega, Ghisseh Sarko, Neal Snape, Kalinka Velasco-Zárate","doi":"10.1075/EUROSLA.6.04HAW","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ionin, Ko and Wexler (2004a) have shown that L2 speakers of English whose L1’s lack articles (Russian and Korean) appear to fluctuate in their interpretation of the and a, allowing them to encode either definiteness or specificity. They argue that these are two options of an Article Choice Parameter offered by Universal Grammar, and that the Russian and Korean speakers fluctuate between them when they are acquiring English. In the present study it is shown that a similar pattern can be observed in L2 speakers of English whose L1 is Japanese (also a language that lacks articles) but not in speakers whose L1 is Greek, a language with articles that encode definiteness like English. It is also shown that while group results for the Japanese speakers suggest fluctuation, individual results do not. It is argued that an account can be given of both cases which does not require appeal either to an Article Choice Parameter or to the concept of ‘fluctuation’. The alternative proposal made here is consistent with Universal Grammar, and follows from an organisation of the grammar where phonological exponents are separated from the lexical items manipulated by syntactic computations, as in Distributed Morphology. It is suggested that a descriptively adequate account which avoids a construction-specific parameter like the Article Choice Parameter and departure from the normal assumptions of UG represented by fluctuation should be preferred.","PeriodicalId":236084,"journal":{"name":"Eurosla Yearbook","volume":"55 49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"90","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurosla Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/EUROSLA.6.04HAW","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

Abstract

Ionin, Ko and Wexler (2004a) have shown that L2 speakers of English whose L1’s lack articles (Russian and Korean) appear to fluctuate in their interpretation of the and a, allowing them to encode either definiteness or specificity. They argue that these are two options of an Article Choice Parameter offered by Universal Grammar, and that the Russian and Korean speakers fluctuate between them when they are acquiring English. In the present study it is shown that a similar pattern can be observed in L2 speakers of English whose L1 is Japanese (also a language that lacks articles) but not in speakers whose L1 is Greek, a language with articles that encode definiteness like English. It is also shown that while group results for the Japanese speakers suggest fluctuation, individual results do not. It is argued that an account can be given of both cases which does not require appeal either to an Article Choice Parameter or to the concept of ‘fluctuation’. The alternative proposal made here is consistent with Universal Grammar, and follows from an organisation of the grammar where phonological exponents are separated from the lexical items manipulated by syntactic computations, as in Distributed Morphology. It is suggested that a descriptively adequate account which avoids a construction-specific parameter like the Article Choice Parameter and departure from the normal assumptions of UG represented by fluctuation should be preferred.
负责第二语言人士的英语文章口译
Ionin, Ko和Wexler (2004a)已经表明,母语缺乏冠词(俄语和韩语)的第二语言英语使用者对冠词和冠词的解释出现波动,使他们能够编码确定性或特异性。他们认为,这是通用语法提供的冠词选择参数的两个选项,俄语和韩语使用者在学习英语时在这两个选项之间波动。本研究表明,在母语为日语(也是一种缺乏冠词的语言)的第二语言英语使用者中可以观察到类似的模式,但在母语为希腊语(一种像英语一样有冠词编码确定性的语言)的使用者中则没有这种模式。研究还表明,虽然日语使用者的群体结果有波动,但个人结果却没有波动。有人认为,这两种情况都可以给出一种解释,而不需要诉诸物品选择参数或“波动”概念。这里提出的另一种建议与普遍语法一致,并且遵循语法组织,其中语音指数与由句法计算操纵的词汇项分开,如分布式形态学。建议采用描述性充分的说明,避免使用特定于结构的参数(如Article Choice parameter)和偏离以波动为代表的UG的正常假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信