Evaluation of methods to correct for IR loss in Eppley PSP diffuse measurements

F. Vignola, Ch. D. Long, I. Reda
{"title":"Evaluation of methods to correct for IR loss in Eppley PSP diffuse measurements","authors":"F. Vignola, Ch. D. Long, I. Reda","doi":"10.1117/12.734474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The IR loss in diffuse measurements made by thermopile pyranometers is examined. Diffuse measurements are used for the study of IR losses because diffuse irradiance is much smaller than the total irradiance and hence the IR effects can be more clearly seen. Specifically, diffuse measurements of an Eppley PSP pyranometer are compared to those made with a Schenk Star pyranometer. Pyranometers with black and white or star type junctions suffer minimal IR loss because the reference and receiving junctions of the thermopile are at the same thermal level. The difference between diffuse values can be attributed to calibration and cosine response errors as well as IR loss. This is a preliminary study over one month when pyrgeometer data are available. Examination of the differences at various times of the year and at more than one location is necessary to generalize the findings in this report. Several methods of correcting for IR loss are examined. First subtracting out the average nighttime offset during the day is tested. Next an extrapolation between early morning and late evening offsets is tested. This should help eliminate the IR offset in both the morning and evening hours, but underestimate the IR losses during the rest of the day. Next, correlations of IR losses calculated using pyrgeometer measurements with temperature, relative humidity, and irradiance are evaluated. Initial results show that it should be possible to use more commonly available measurements rather than prygeometer data to estimate IR loss for Eppley PSP pyranometers.","PeriodicalId":142821,"journal":{"name":"SPIE Optics + Photonics for Sustainable Energy","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPIE Optics + Photonics for Sustainable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.734474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The IR loss in diffuse measurements made by thermopile pyranometers is examined. Diffuse measurements are used for the study of IR losses because diffuse irradiance is much smaller than the total irradiance and hence the IR effects can be more clearly seen. Specifically, diffuse measurements of an Eppley PSP pyranometer are compared to those made with a Schenk Star pyranometer. Pyranometers with black and white or star type junctions suffer minimal IR loss because the reference and receiving junctions of the thermopile are at the same thermal level. The difference between diffuse values can be attributed to calibration and cosine response errors as well as IR loss. This is a preliminary study over one month when pyrgeometer data are available. Examination of the differences at various times of the year and at more than one location is necessary to generalize the findings in this report. Several methods of correcting for IR loss are examined. First subtracting out the average nighttime offset during the day is tested. Next an extrapolation between early morning and late evening offsets is tested. This should help eliminate the IR offset in both the morning and evening hours, but underestimate the IR losses during the rest of the day. Next, correlations of IR losses calculated using pyrgeometer measurements with temperature, relative humidity, and irradiance are evaluated. Initial results show that it should be possible to use more commonly available measurements rather than prygeometer data to estimate IR loss for Eppley PSP pyranometers.
Eppley PSP漫射测量中红外损耗校正方法的评价
研究了热电堆热辐射计在漫射测量中的红外损耗。漫射测量用于研究红外损耗,因为漫射辐照度比总辐照度小得多,因此红外效应可以更清楚地看到。具体地说,我们将Eppley PSP高温计的漫射测量结果与申克星高温计的漫射测量结果进行了比较。由于热电堆的参考结和接收结处于相同的热水平,带有黑白结或星型结的热辐射计遭受最小的红外损失。漫射值之间的差异可归因于校准和余弦响应误差以及红外损耗。这是一项为期一个多月的初步研究,当时可以获得几何学数据。为了概括本报告的结论,有必要对一年中不同时间和一个以上地点的差异进行审查。研究了几种校正红外损耗的方法。首先,减去白天的平均夜间偏移量进行测试。接下来,对清晨和傍晚偏移量之间的外推进行了测试。这应该有助于消除早晨和晚上的红外抵消,但低估了一天中其余时间的红外损失。接下来,利用热几何测量计算的红外损失与温度、相对湿度和辐照度的相关性进行了评估。初步结果表明,可以使用更常用的测量方法,而不是几何数据来估计Eppley PSP辐射计的红外损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信