Adopting and adapting sustainability accounting: fit and faith in a family business

R. Maughan
{"title":"Adopting and adapting sustainability accounting: fit and faith in a family business","authors":"R. Maughan","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-02-2020-4410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretically informed analysis of the evolution of environmental management accounting (EMA) and social and environmental reporting (SER), and the accompanying development of a sustainability programme, in a large family-owned, unlisted corporation.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal case study based on semi-structured interviews and documentary data was conducted. The main periods of fieldwork were carried out in 2007 and between 2010 and 2012. Sustainability reports were collected until 2019 when SER appeared to cease. The case analysis draws on the concepts of organisational identity (OI) and internal legitimacy (IL) to examine the decision-making and actions of a range of key organisational actors as they engage with EMA and SER.FindingsThe study demonstrates that a gap between an organisation’s identity claims (“who we are”) and its enacted identity (“what we do”) can enable the adoption of constitutive, performative and representational EMA and SER. It illuminates the nature of the role of key actors and organisational dynamics, in the form of OI and IL, in adapting these practices. It also demonstrates that, in giving meaning to the concept of sustainability, organisational actors can draw on their organisation’s identity and construct the comprehensibility of an organisational sustainability programme.Research limitations/implicationsMore empirical work is needed to examine the applicability of OI and IL to other settings. It would also be beneficial to examine the potential for OI work to allow organisations to change and reinvent themselves in response to the evermore pressing environmental crisis and the role, if any, of EMA in this process.Originality/valueThe study enriches our understanding of why and how EMA and SER evolve by demonstrating that paying attention to OI and IL can provide further insight into the decision-making and actions of organisational members as they recognise, evaluate, support and cease these practices.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-02-2020-4410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a theoretically informed analysis of the evolution of environmental management accounting (EMA) and social and environmental reporting (SER), and the accompanying development of a sustainability programme, in a large family-owned, unlisted corporation.Design/methodology/approachA longitudinal case study based on semi-structured interviews and documentary data was conducted. The main periods of fieldwork were carried out in 2007 and between 2010 and 2012. Sustainability reports were collected until 2019 when SER appeared to cease. The case analysis draws on the concepts of organisational identity (OI) and internal legitimacy (IL) to examine the decision-making and actions of a range of key organisational actors as they engage with EMA and SER.FindingsThe study demonstrates that a gap between an organisation’s identity claims (“who we are”) and its enacted identity (“what we do”) can enable the adoption of constitutive, performative and representational EMA and SER. It illuminates the nature of the role of key actors and organisational dynamics, in the form of OI and IL, in adapting these practices. It also demonstrates that, in giving meaning to the concept of sustainability, organisational actors can draw on their organisation’s identity and construct the comprehensibility of an organisational sustainability programme.Research limitations/implicationsMore empirical work is needed to examine the applicability of OI and IL to other settings. It would also be beneficial to examine the potential for OI work to allow organisations to change and reinvent themselves in response to the evermore pressing environmental crisis and the role, if any, of EMA in this process.Originality/valueThe study enriches our understanding of why and how EMA and SER evolve by demonstrating that paying attention to OI and IL can provide further insight into the decision-making and actions of organisational members as they recognise, evaluate, support and cease these practices.
采用和适应可持续性会计:对家族企业的适应性和信心
本文的目的是对一家大型家族企业非上市公司的环境管理会计(EMA)和社会与环境报告(SER)的演变,以及伴随而来的可持续发展计划进行理论分析。设计/方法/方法基于半结构化访谈和文献数据进行纵向案例研究。实地调查的主要时期是在2007年和2010年至2012年之间。可持续发展报告一直收集到2019年,当时SER似乎停止了。案例分析借鉴了组织认同(OI)和内部合法性(IL)的概念,以检查一系列关键组织参与者在参与EMA和SER时的决策和行动。研究结果表明,组织的身份声明(“我们是谁”)与其制定的身份(“我们做什么”)之间的差距可以使组织采用构成性、表演性和代表性的EMA和SER。它以OI和IL的形式阐明了关键参与者和组织动力学在适应这些实践中的作用的本质。它还表明,在赋予可持续性概念意义时,组织参与者可以利用其组织的身份并构建组织可持续性计划的可理解性。研究的局限性/意义需要更多的实证工作来检验OI和IL在其他环境中的适用性。检查OI工作的潜力也将是有益的,它允许组织改变和重塑自己,以应对日益紧迫的环境危机和EMA在这一过程中的作用(如果有的话)。独创性/价值该研究通过证明关注OI和IL可以进一步洞察组织成员在认识、评估、支持和停止这些实践时的决策和行动,丰富了我们对EMA和SER为何以及如何发展的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信