Spinoza and Sexuality

A. Matheron
{"title":"Spinoza and Sexuality","authors":"A. Matheron","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474440103.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this striking chapter Matheron deals directly with the seemingly bizarre claims that Spinoza makes about women and sexuality in his writings. By reconstructing the context in which Spinoza makes seven at first glance prudish or scandalous claims about women and sexuality, Matheron effectively eliminates every misunderstanding and misreading that has arisen in the nearly 400 years since Spinoza published his major works. Spinoza’s radical anti-teleology and theory of desire lead Matheron to lay out the arguments for a number of memorable claims: that Spinoza might be the only early modern philosopher—and perhaps one of the rare philosophers from any period—whose views can ground the reality of non-genital sexuality, that the passions to which men are subject, and not women, are responsible for sexual drama, and that women are in no way incapable of becoming sages in the Spinozist sense.","PeriodicalId":229413,"journal":{"name":"Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics, Ontology and Knowledge in Spinoza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474440103.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this striking chapter Matheron deals directly with the seemingly bizarre claims that Spinoza makes about women and sexuality in his writings. By reconstructing the context in which Spinoza makes seven at first glance prudish or scandalous claims about women and sexuality, Matheron effectively eliminates every misunderstanding and misreading that has arisen in the nearly 400 years since Spinoza published his major works. Spinoza’s radical anti-teleology and theory of desire lead Matheron to lay out the arguments for a number of memorable claims: that Spinoza might be the only early modern philosopher—and perhaps one of the rare philosophers from any period—whose views can ground the reality of non-genital sexuality, that the passions to which men are subject, and not women, are responsible for sexual drama, and that women are in no way incapable of becoming sages in the Spinozist sense.
斯宾诺莎与性
在这个引人注目的章节中,Matheron直接处理了斯宾诺莎在他的作品中关于女性和性的看似奇怪的主张。通过重建斯宾诺莎对女性和性的七个乍一看是假的或可耻的主张的背景,Matheron有效地消除了斯宾诺莎发表其主要作品近400年来出现的每一个误解和误读。斯宾诺莎激进的反目的论和欲望理论使Matheron提出了一系列令人难忘的主张:斯宾诺莎可能是唯一的早期现代哲学家——也许是任何时期罕见的哲学家之一——他的观点可以奠定非生殖器性行为的现实,男人的激情,而不是女人,是性戏剧的主体,女人绝不可能成为斯宾诺莎意义上的圣人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信