Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Pulp & Paper Mills: Comparison Between MFO With Biomass in Lime Kiln

Yonki Alexander Volta, Rusdianasari, Syahirman Yusi
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in Pulp & Paper Mills: Comparison Between MFO With Biomass in Lime Kiln","authors":"Yonki Alexander Volta, Rusdianasari, Syahirman Yusi","doi":"10.2991/AHE.K.210205.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pulp and paper mills keeps trying to take advantage of renewable energy as an energy source. One of utilization is used bark as renewable energy source to substitute fossil fuel. Bark from wood preparation utilized in bark gasifier to produced syngas as primary fuel in lime kiln. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of biomass utilization to environment using life cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The “gate to gate” approach was used to evaluate two scenarios of different fuel combination: (1) 75% biomass and (2) 100% MFO as primary fuel in the lime kiln for 1000 kg CaO. Evaluation of environment impact related to each scenario using ISO 14040 (2006) that consist of goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) and interpretation. Result shown used biomass to produce syngas as fuel in lime kiln has impact to global warming 4.25E+01 kqCO 2 /ton CaO. Its lower than if used MFO that impact to global warming 6.91E+01 kqCO 2 / ton CaO. For increased environmental quality, using 100% biomass as primary fuel in lime kiln is recommended.","PeriodicalId":310770,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th Forum in Research, Science, and Technology (FIRST-T1-T2-2020)","volume":"286 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th Forum in Research, Science, and Technology (FIRST-T1-T2-2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/AHE.K.210205.054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Pulp and paper mills keeps trying to take advantage of renewable energy as an energy source. One of utilization is used bark as renewable energy source to substitute fossil fuel. Bark from wood preparation utilized in bark gasifier to produced syngas as primary fuel in lime kiln. The aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of biomass utilization to environment using life cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The “gate to gate” approach was used to evaluate two scenarios of different fuel combination: (1) 75% biomass and (2) 100% MFO as primary fuel in the lime kiln for 1000 kg CaO. Evaluation of environment impact related to each scenario using ISO 14040 (2006) that consist of goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) and interpretation. Result shown used biomass to produce syngas as fuel in lime kiln has impact to global warming 4.25E+01 kqCO 2 /ton CaO. Its lower than if used MFO that impact to global warming 6.91E+01 kqCO 2 / ton CaO. For increased environmental quality, using 100% biomass as primary fuel in lime kiln is recommended.
制浆造纸厂生命周期评价(LCA):石灰窑MFO与生物质的比较
纸浆和造纸厂一直在努力利用可再生能源作为能源。利用树皮作为可再生能源替代化石燃料是其中的一种。利用树皮气化炉生产合成气作为石灰窑的主要燃料。本研究的目的是利用生命周期评价方法(LCA)来评价生物质利用对环境的影响。采用“门到门”的方法,对两种不同燃料组合的情景进行了评估:(1)75%生物质和(2)100% MFO作为1000 kg CaO的石灰窑一次燃料。使用ISO 14040(2006)评估与每个方案相关的环境影响,包括目标和范围定义、清单分析、生命周期影响评估(LCIA)和解释。结果表明,在石灰窑中使用生物质生产合成气对全球变暖的影响为4.25E+01 kqco2 /t CaO。它比使用MFO对全球变暖的影响低6.91E+01 kqCO 2 /吨CaO。为了提高环境质量,建议使用100%生物质作为石灰窑的主要燃料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信